You've read 7 articles this month

TPM is funded overwhelmingly by readers’ membership fees. More than 91% of our revenue is derived from memberships and reader contributions. The rest comes from advertising. As a fully independent organization, TPM has no corporate overlords. TPM is not beholden to or controlled by any outside interests. TPM was founded by a journalist and to this day its “business” side is staffed with former journalists whose primary mission is to create a sustainable environment for our reporters and editors to do great work.

Want better media? Support a better media company

  • Reader-funded
  • Unionized
  • Mission-driven

Effort To Shut Off The NSA’s Water Supply Goes Bipartisan In California

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper listens as he testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 12, 2013, before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on worldwide threats. Clapper delivered... Director of National Intelligence James Clapper listens as he testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 12, 2013, before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on worldwide threats. Clapper delivered the U.S. intelligence community's overview of global threats posed by terrorism, cyber attacks, weapons of mass destruction, the months-long civil war in Syria and the unsettled situation in post-Arab Spring nations. MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The National Security Agency nullifiers have gained a toehold.

A pair of California state senators, one Democrat and one Republican, have introduced legislation to prevent the state from helping NSA mass surveillance.

“The National Security Agency’s massive level of spying and indiscriminate collecting of phone and electronic data on all Americans, including more than 38 million Californians, is a direct threat to our liberty and freedom,” state Sen. Ted Lieu (D), who co-authored the bill with state Sen. Joel Anderson (R), said in a statement on Monday.

The measure would ban state agencies, officials, and corporations that provide services to the state from “supporting or assisting the federal government to spy or collect certain data on Californians,” according to a press release.

“State-funded public resources should not be going toward aiding the NSA or any other federal agency from indiscriminate spying on its own citizens and gathering electronic or metadata that violates the Fourth Amendment,” Lieu said.

Based on model legislation developed by the California-based Tenth Amendment Center, the measure would also ban state and local criminal investigations from using electronic data the federal government obtained without a specific warrant.

The Tenth Amendment Center, a nullification group that has previously engaged in gun rights and anti-Obamacare efforts, began promoting the model legislation, known as the 4th Amendment Protection Act, late last year. The center has promoted the effort by arguing that, if the measure were to pass in Utah, it would mean cutting off the water supply to the NSA’s new Utah Data Center.

According to The Tenth Amendment Center, the NSA does not currently operate a data or “threat operations” center in California, but the center argues the measure would make the agency’s expansion more difficult.

“Since the NSA is expanding so wildly, it’s not unlikely that they’re planning to build new data centers and ‘threat operations centers’ in other locations,” Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey said in a statement. “California’s high-tech industry makes it a likely candidate.”

Latest Muckraker
1
Show Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: