The Defense Rests Its Case In The Manafort Trial

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

ALEXANDRIA, VA — Lawyers representing Paul Manafort have rested their case in his financial crimes trial. The defense did not call any witnesses or present any evidence.

The move followed arguments on a motion for acquittal filed by the defense. Judge T.S. Ellis denied the motion.

Ellis then called Manafort to the podium and asked him if he wished to testify.

“No sir,” Manafort replied.

Manafort is on trial here facing bank and tax fraud charges arising from his work as a political operative in Ukraine. Manafort went on to become campaign manager of Donald Trump’s 2016 election bid. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

Manafort’s prosecution by special counsel Robert Mueller is the first to emerge from his investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 elections.

The prosecution rested its case yesterday following two weeks of evidence detailing years of Manafort’s financial life, including alleged efforts to avoid paying U.S. income taxes on the money he earned overseas and efforts, after his income flow dried up, to fraudulently apply for loans in the United States.

The trial largely avoided mention of the 2016 campaign and Trump’s presidency until the final days, when witnesses for the prosecution laid out an alleged effort by Manafort to secure an administration job for a banker, Stephen Calk of Chicago’s Federal Savings Bank, who allegedly knowingly approved two fraudulent loans to Manafort.

The last three days of trial have been dominated by closed-door meetings between the judge and lawyers for both sides, the subject of which remains unknown. Speculation is that there is an issue of some kind with the jury, but the judge has shed no light on the matter in public settings. A two-hour sealed session was held Tuesday morning before the courtroom opened to the public at 11:30 a.m ET. It came after another sealed hearing Monday evening and significant delays in the trial Friday for meetings between the judge and lawyers.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. What case?

  2. It’s important to get enough rest.

  3. And now we see if the jury was paying any attention, at all.

    There’ll be a bit of wrangling, I imagine, on the jury instructions that the judge will issue. And then we wait…

  4. The defense did not call any witnesses or present any evidence.

    Gee…I wonder who’s expecting a pardon.

  5. Can’t wait to read the judge’s instructions to the jury!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

167 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for xpurg8d Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for cmbudinger Avatar for avattoir Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for pdxer Avatar for robcat2075 Avatar for gharlane Avatar for tena Avatar for guysmiley Avatar for pdq Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for birdford Avatar for asturcot Avatar for katscherger Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for erik_t Avatar for allenemilyh Avatar for timorwig Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for thomaspaine

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: