Sessions Denies He Misled Judiciary Committee

Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks at the Justice Department in Washington, Thursday, March 2, 2017. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks at the Justice Department in Washington, Thursday, March 2, 2017. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Attorney General Jeff Sessions denied on Thursday that he misled the Senate Judiciary Committee when he said during confirmation hearings that he did not have any contact with Russia during the campaign.

“I never had meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign, and the idea that I was part of a ‘continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government’ is totally false,” Sessions told reporters at a press conference.

The Washington Post reported Wednesday night that Sessions met twice with the Russian ambassador to the United States during the campaign.

Sessions was referring to a CNN report at the time that the intelligence community had presented President Donald Trump with documents that alleged in part “a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government,” according to the network

Sessions said that didn’t describe his contact with the Russian ambassador.

“That is the question that Sen. Franken asked me at the hearing, and that’s what got my attention, as he noted it was the first, just breaking news,” Sessions said. “And it got my attention, and that is the question I responded to. I did not respond by referring to the two meetings, one very brief after a speech, and one with two of my senior staffers, professional staffers, with the Russian ambassador in Washington, where no such things were discussed.”

“My reply to the question of Sen. Franken was honest and correct as I understood it at the time,” he said.

Franken had quoted from the report in his question to Sessions during the hearing and then asked: “[I]f it’s true, it’s obviously extremely serious, and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?”

Sessions said he would write to the committee to further explain.

At the end of the press conference, Sessions added: “That’s what I focused my answer on,” referring to the CNN report. “In retrospect, I should have slowed down and said, ‘But I did meet one Russian official a couple of times.'”

This post has been updated.

Latest Livewire
46
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. This is gonna make Watergate seem like a high school spat.

  2. “…as I understood it at the time.”

    Oh fuuuuckkk you, buddy.

  3. “My reply to the question of Sen. Franken was honest and correct as I understood it at the time,” he said.

    Nope. Neither honest, nor correct. Not even a close call.

    Franken: "CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump’s surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

    “Now, again, I’m telling you this as it’s coming out, so you know. But if it’s true, it’s obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?”

    Sessions: “Senator Franken, I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn’t have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.”

    Sessions gave an unqualifed denial of having “communications with Russians”. Not " Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries" or on the subject of being “part of a ‘continuing exchange of information’ during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government”.

    A complete unqualified blanket denial.

    Therefore, a straight-out lie. Perjury.

  4. A lawyerly response but why did he not disclose that he met with the Ambassador?

  5. Quavering, weak…he himself makes the case he’s confused and easily duped. We deserve better.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

40 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for mbodlomane Avatar for agio Avatar for deckbose Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for mantan Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for johnbarleycorn Avatar for danny Avatar for emjayay Avatar for rockgolf Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for nymund Avatar for candirue Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for maximus Avatar for drtv Avatar for jadez

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: