NYTimes Sheds Light On Its Deal With Conservative Author Dishing Clinton Dirt

Hillary Rodham Clinton answers questions at a news conference at the United Nations, Tuesday, March 10, 2015. Clinton conceded that she should have used a government email to conduct business as secretary of state,... Hillary Rodham Clinton answers questions at a news conference at the United Nations, Tuesday, March 10, 2015. Clinton conceded that she should have used a government email to conduct business as secretary of state, saying her decision was simply a matter of "convenience." (AP Photo/Richard Drew) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The New York Times’ public editor on Thursday addressed blowback from readers and critics over the paper’s decision to enter into an “exclusive” agreement with a conservative author shopping dirt on Hillary and Bill Clinton.

“The Times should have been much more clear with readers about the nature of this arrangement,” public editor Margaret Sullivan wrote.

The paper divulged on Sunday that it had obtained an “exclusive” deal with Peter Schweizer. The disclosure came in the middle of an article about his book, “Clinton Cash,” an investigation of the power duo’s connections with foreign donors.

Sullivan fielded complaints from readers over the arrangement, airing their questions about the nature of the deal. Interviewing Times editor Matt Purdy, she reported that no money was exchanged for research on the Clintons.

Here’s what Purdy said:

Months ago, we were given early galleys of the book and offered exclusive rights to all the material in it. We declined because the publisher wanted to dictate when we would publish articles. Recently, we told the author that we wanted to do a story building on a chapter in his book that grew out of work we did in 2008. But we said there could be no conditions on what we wrote or when we published, and he agreed. We chose to focus on the material that we felt was the most newsworthy for our readers. We used the lead time to thoroughly scrutinize information in the book and to build on it using our own sources and public records.

Purdy also told Sullivan that the arrangement with Schweizer “is no different than the way we treat information from any other source. “

While praising the paper for avoiding any financial exchange, Sullivan expressed concern about the opaque nature of the deal.

“[T]he description of the ‘exclusive’ agreements, and the suggestion it contains that The Times made a deal to stay away from certain story lines is troubling,” she wrote.

The original Times article also said both Fox News and The Washington Post made a similar pact with Schweizer. TPM obtained statements by both the Times and Fox pushing back against criticism of the “agreements.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. we told the author that we wanted to do a story building on a chapter in his book that grew out of work we did in 2008

    What work that you did? Good god, I’m not in the news business but that’s an incredibly weak and pathetic answer.

  2. The point of it all is to derail Clinton with bogus crap. It wouldn’t be a first time for the “paper of record”.

    That’s why I stopped reading it years ago…anyone can do that.

  3. Avatar for bdtex bdtex says:

    NY Times-desperately seeking relevancy

  4. So it’s faint light on the dark dirt deal…Mushrooms, anyone?

  5. It took them what, two, three days to come up with this claptrap?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

66 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for lockheedkeynesian Avatar for caffinatedone Avatar for jonathang Avatar for dv01 Avatar for berkshire_boy Avatar for lonewolf_93 Avatar for weezer Avatar for trippin Avatar for opinionated1 Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for mantan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for rssrai Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for lillithmc Avatar for azjude Avatar for usednrare Avatar for reggid Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for sjlilly44 Avatar for sophiect Avatar for jesus_quintana

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: