Magistrate Who Once Used N-Word Replaced After Dylann Roof Hearing

CORRECTS SPELLING OF DYLANN NOT DYLAN - Judge James Gosnell speaks during a bond hearing for Dylann Storm Roof at a court in North Charleston, S.C. on Friday, June 19, 2015. Roof, 21, who faces nine counts of murder ... CORRECTS SPELLING OF DYLANN NOT DYLAN - Judge James Gosnell speaks during a bond hearing for Dylann Storm Roof at a court in North Charleston, S.C. on Friday, June 19, 2015. Roof, 21, who faces nine counts of murder in the shooting deaths at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, appeared by video from the county jail. (Grace Beahm/The Post and Courier via AP, Pool) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The chief magistrate of Charleston County, South Carolina was replaced Wednesday, less than a week after presiding over the bond hearing for the white, 21-year-old man who allegedly killed nine people at a historic black church.

James Gosnell notified the South Carolina Supreme Court that he didn’t want to be re-considered for the position when his term expired at the end of the month, his attorney, Lionel Lofton, told local TV station WCIV. He is expected to remain a magistrate judge.

Lofton told The Post and Courier newspaper that his client “just decided he was tired of being chief magistrate.”

Gosnell was heavily criticized in recent days for urging sympathy for Charleston shooting suspect Dylann Roof’s family before allowing his victims’ loved ones to address the court at the Friday bond hearing.

“We have victims — nine of them,” Gosnell said at the hearing, as quoted by WCIV. “But we also have victims on the other side. We must find it in our heart at some point in time not only to help those that are victims but to also help his family as well.”

After the bond hearing, The Daily Beast also surfaced a reprimand Gosnell received in 2005 from the state Supreme Court for using the N-word in court. Gosnell was presiding over a 2003 bond reduction hearing for a black defendant whom he knew personally when he repeated something he said he’d learned from a black sheriff’s deputy, according to the Supreme Court’s finding.

“There are four kinds of people in this world – black people, white people, red necks, and n_____,” Gosnell told the defendant, as quoted by the court finding.

The finding stated that Gosnell explained he “repeated this statement to the defendant in an ill-considered effort to encourage him to recognize and change the path he had chosen in life.”

Latest Livewire
13
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. ¨“There are four kinds of people in this world - black people, white people, red necks, and n_____," Gosnell told the defendant, as quoted by the court finding.¨

    He remained Chief Magistrate after saying that?! The headline’s misleading: he didn’t just ¨once (use) the N-word," he endorsed full-bore racism lock, stock, and barrel.

    It must be all Obama’s fault for using the word on the WTF podcast.

  2. But still a magistrate judge? The video of the bizarre bond hearing he conducted should be Exhibit A when he’s brought up on charges of judicial misconduct.

  3. So he used the word nigger…in a judicial action in which he presided and that was worthy only of a reprimand? How’d the Black guy fare? Did anyone consider that someone so entrenched in that thinking he did not feel the need to be cautious in the use of its language in a courtroom…as a fucking Judge…might not be emotionally or psychologically fit to be that Judge? Someone thought you could reprimand that crap away?

  4. There is a fifth group: racists.

  5. I knew there was something wrong about that guy from the beginning. What judge makes a fucking statement at a bond hearing like he did anyway, and allows victim impact statements entered into the record, even before a trial?

    Someone is gonna have to go back and do a thorough judicial review of all his cases, particularly any cases involving African Americans, either as defendants or plaintiffs. He shouldn’t be allowed to get off scot-free. Pre-judging kind of defeats the purpose to a fair hearing from of a judge. And he clearly is one prejudice judge.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

7 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for afblac Avatar for leftflank Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for txlemmom Avatar for barblzz Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for mpower1952

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: