Carlson Speaks Out: Roger Ailes’ Verbal Harassment Was ‘Continuous’

FILE - This Nov. 30, 2010 file photo shows Gretchen Carlson, co-host of the "Fox & friends" television program appears on the show in New York. A video shown Wednesday, May 30, 2012, on "Fox & Friends," and praised... FILE - This Nov. 30, 2010 file photo shows Gretchen Carlson, co-host of the "Fox & friends" television program appears on the show in New York. A video shown Wednesday, May 30, 2012, on "Fox & Friends," and praised by co-anchors Brian Kilmeade and Carlson, drew criticism from media critics about the video critical of President Barack Obama's record that resembled a campaign attack ad. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, file) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In her first public interview since she filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Fox News chairman Roger Ailes, former anchor Gretchen Carlson said she came forward because she “finally felt it was time” to speak out.

“I just wanted to stand up for myself, first and foremost,” Carlson told The New York Times in a Tuesday interview at her lawyer Nancy Erika Smith’s New Jersey home. “And I wanted to stand up for other women who maybe faced similar circumstances.”

The former “Real Story” host stood by the allegations laid out in the lawsuit, claiming that Ailes made sexual advances towards her, oversaw a culture of sexual harassment at Fox News and fired her because she refused him and complained about her treatment at the network.

She told the Times that she kept quiet about the “continuous” offensive language she heard from Ailes because of the hierarchical structure of the network.

“Everyone knew how powerful Roger Ailes was,” she said. “I certainly felt intimidated by that.”

Ailes has denied all of the charges, insisting that Carlson filed the “retaliatory” suit because she was upset that her contract was terminated.

Fox News spokeswoman Irena Briganti told the Times that Carlson “never filed a formal complaint about sexual harassment” to the human resources or legal departments. Over a dozen hosts at the network, including Kimberly Guilfoyle, Greta Van Susteren, Geraldo Rivera, and Sean Hannity, have spoken out in defense of Ailes and the network.

Carlson told the Times that their support was qualified by the fact that “they’re still being paid by Fox.”

Other allegations of sexual harassment surfaced last weekend in a New York Magazine article that shared stories from six women who said Ailes pressured them to exchange sexual favors with him in exchange for job opportunities between the mid-1960s and 1989. The shocking allegations, which include explicit requests for sex and for women to pose privately for him, were denied by Ailes’ lawyer, Barry Asen.

The Fox chairman’s legal team filed a motion for the suit to be moved from a New Jersey Superior Court to a federal court last week, and also claimed Carlson breached her contract by trying to bypass the arbitration process outlined in her network contract. Carlson’s lawyers told the Times they would file a response next week.

21st Century Fox, the parent company of Fox News, has also contracted law firm Paul, Weiss to conduct an internal investigation into Carlson’s allegations.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. The Fox chairman’s legal team filed a motion for the suit to be moved from a New Jersey Superior Court to a federal court last week, and also claimed Carlson breached her contract by trying to bypass the arbitration process outlined in her network contract.

    The SCOTUS has done the American worker no favors by continuously finding in favor these employers’ “arbitration clauses” in contracts. Corporations–both as employers and manufacturers–wield far too much power over us.

  2. By filing against Ailes personally (and not News Corp), I doubt that the contractual provision regarding arbitration doesn’t apply.

  3. There’s no way sexual harassment is included in the issues mandating arbitration in any employment contract. It’s ridiculous.

  4. It was early. I should have said, I doubt that the contractual provision regarding arbitration applies because the suit is a personal suit against Ailes and not the corporation. Now whether this impedes her ability to create a civil cause of action, I don’t know. However I suspect Carlson’s attorneys didn’t want to sue the corporation both because of the arbitration issue and also because Carlson hopes to be rehired eventually by Fox. Also this might give the Murdoch sons the motivation (that some claim they have) to get rid of Ailes earlier rather than later.

  5. Bye bye Ailes. The corruption at the center of FOX is amazing.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

26 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for bp Avatar for cassandram Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for leftflank Avatar for avattoir Avatar for 1gg Avatar for dave_adams Avatar for learning Avatar for thx1138 Avatar for invitedguest Avatar for yskov Avatar for moderately_disgusted Avatar for go2goal Avatar for zrx1100 Avatar for va_dawg Avatar for twresq Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for beattycat Avatar for typodog Avatar for irishbark Avatar for dorkmeister

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: