FEMA Administrator: Irma Is ‘A Worst Case Scenario’ For FL Areas In Its Path

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Administrator Brock Long speaks during a news conference in Washington, Thursday, Aug. 31, 2017, about Harvey’s devastating flooding. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
FILE - In this Aug. 31, 2017, file photo, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Administrator Brock Long speaks during a news conference in Washington. At FEMA headquarters, top officials responsible for respond... FILE - In this Aug. 31, 2017, file photo, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Administrator Brock Long speaks during a news conference in Washington. At FEMA headquarters, top officials responsible for responding to large-scale public emergencies meet regularly to conduct drills and update plans covering numerous worst-case scenarios. That includes what to do if two massive hurricanes strike the U.S. mainland within days, 1,000 miles apart. Those plans are now being put into action as Hurricane Irma bears down on the Florida coast less than a week after Hurricane Harvey flooded much of Houston. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File) MORE LESS

Brock Long, the administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, on Sunday said Hurricane Irma is a “worst case scenario” for the parts of Florida in the storm’s path.

“This is a worst case scenario for Monroe County, Florida Keys and the west coast of Florida,” Long said on “Fox News Sunday.”

He said areas in the “northeast quadrant” are “where the maximum radius winds are, that define the intensity of the storm, that’s where storm surge is most prevalent.”

“Storm surge has the highest potential to kill the highest amount of people and cause the most amount of damage,” Long said. “If the water starts to rise around you and you become isolated, try to get into a facility that you think can withstand the winds and get elevated. Get out of the storm surge.”

71
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Okay, I don’t mean to be flippant here, but what is it with the baseball caps in a national emergency? Is that the sign of seriousness? And how utterly repulsive is Rick Scott. I know, the bar is very high for an answer to that question.

  2. I’m afraid this falls into the “No shit, Sherlock” category of observations. It is, however, almost refreshing in a Republican administration to have a FEMA director who is able to recognize the obvious. It is at least a change from the usual “The hurricane is a hoax perpetrated by the liberal media and the scientists. Nothing to be afraid of.”

  3. I think it has become clear that God has decided subtly is wasted on us in regard to Global Climate Change and has pulled out the big guns…

    And for all you Leviticus fans out there:
    “The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants. Throughout the land that you hold, you shall provide for the redemption of the land.” Leviticus 25:23-24

  4. Well, either that, or someone somewhere baked a wedding cake for a gay wedding. It’s hard to decide.

  5. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    The Republican position on climate change reminds me of an oncologist who encourages his patients to smoke, preferring to treat them afterwards, when they have advanced lung cancer. At which point little to nothing could be done beyond the palliative. A physician like that would/should lose his license.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

65 more replies

Participants

Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for grindelwald Avatar for becca656 Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for arrendis Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for ottnott Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for hornblower Avatar for tena Avatar for curtpurcell Avatar for tiowally Avatar for charliedontsurf Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for maximus Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for carolson Avatar for heartless

Continue Discussion