GOPer: If Trump Doesn’t Clear Up Travel Ban Issues, Congress ‘Might’ Step In

UNITED STATES - MAY 7: Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., conducts a news conference in the Capitol's Senate studio after the Senate passed the Iran Nuclear Review Act, May 7, 2015. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ R... UNITED STATES - MAY 7: Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., conducts a news conference in the Capitol's Senate studio after the Senate passed the Iran Nuclear Review Act, May 7, 2015. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Senate Foreign Relations Chair Bob Corker (R-TN) said that it was possible that Congress would take legislative action to address the concerns lawmakers have raised about President Trump’s immigration executive order, if the administration wasn’t able to clear up the issues in the next few days.

“I think they understand it was a misfire here,” Corker told reporters Monday on Capitol Hill. “I’d rather them have a few days to come back and talk to us a little bit more about what they’re really going to do, and then I’d judge that, and then there might be some legislative action. “

The executive order, which Trump signed Friday evening, targeted nationals from seven majority-Muslim countries. It caused immediate chaos as travelers, including some green card-holders, were detained in U.S. airports on hours on end while others were blocked from coming to America entirely. After some confusion, the Trump administration softened its position, and said it did not apply to green carder holders. Yet lawmakers have taken issue with aspects of the order that would also block others, including Iraqi interpreters who assisted the U.S. military from entering the United States.

“Obviously the communication was not there. The agency process was not there. Folks here on the Hill were not aware of what was getting ready to happen. People around the world were not aware. Chaos ensued,” Corker said, when asked about whether Congress should take some action to amend it. “Then there’s the substance issue of what this really means, which they are working with us right now to make sure we fully understand what it is they’re implementing. In a few days, if there are still some concerns then possibly, but right now, I’d rather them more fully develop what it is they really have initiated.”

Latest Livewire
75
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. What, not enough Mooslims excluded for ya, BoB?

  2. Avatar for tena tena says:

    Hey, he’s working against PeePee here - get it? I’ll take it.

  3. That’s what it says, but for some reason I’m kinda highly dubious of a Tennessee Republican coming to the rescue of an oppressed minority group. It ain’t in his heritage…

    Call me cynical, but I hope you’re right.

  4. When standing up to the Orange Nazi, if Corker pours about three more boxes of Lime Jell-O into the base of his neck, he might develop a spine as rigid as Crash McPalin, which is to say, non-existent.

  5. Senator Corker: What part of No apologies do you not understand?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

69 more replies

Participants

Avatar for cabchi Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for leftflank Avatar for clemmers Avatar for trnc Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for dnl Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for pshah Avatar for magicmaker Avatar for tena Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for maximus Avatar for krux Avatar for pauldownard Avatar for aiddon Avatar for the_loan_arranger

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: