Ammon Bundy Offered To Plead Guilty To Get Fellow Occupiers Off The Hook

Ammon Bundy, one of the sons of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, speaks during an interview at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Tuesday, Jan. 5, 2016, near Burns, Ore. Law enforcement had yet to take any action Tuesday ... Ammon Bundy, one of the sons of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, speaks during an interview at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Tuesday, Jan. 5, 2016, near Burns, Ore. Law enforcement had yet to take any action Tuesday against a group numbering close to two dozen, led by Bundy and his brother, who are upset over federal land policy. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer) MORE LESS

An Oregonian report reveals that Ammon Bundy, the leader of the 41-day takeover of the Malheur Wildlife Refuge in Oregon, offered to plead guilty to the federal criminal charges against him if federal authorities would let the remaining occupiers go free.

Bundy tried to strike the deal three day after his arrest in January while the standoff was still ongoing, but the Oregonian reports that prosecutors rejected it.

“He was willing to sacrifice his broader interests and risk his liberty for his fellow protesters then,” his lawyers argued in a new court document arguing they need more time to prepare for trial.

If they cannot get more time, they want Bundy to have an “immediate” trial all to himself, according to the Oregonian.

The fact that Bundy tried to negotiate a plea deal with authorities and they turned it down illuminates just how hard a line prosecutors may be taking with this case. In a 2014 standoff involving Bundy as well as his father Cliven Bundy, federal officials were often criticized for letting more than a year pass before they brought charges. In the Oregon case, prosecutors cast a wide net. Ultimately 26 people were charged in the refuge standoff.

42
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. C’mon, straight-shooter. If you’re guilty, just admit it. Not as part of some crooked back room deal.

  2. None of these clowns should be allowed to plead out. They should each get a jury trial, and face sentencing by a judge unencumbered by some deal with the prosecution. Without that, the clear message will, instead, be muddied.

  3. What a character this guy is.

  4. What we’ve got here is failure to communicate.

  5. Hey, TPM–proofread the headline. It sounds like these guys were occupying a hook, which sounds both visually interesting and extremely uncomfortable.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

36 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for silvrfox Avatar for druid800 Avatar for jw1 Avatar for sooner Avatar for austinite Avatar for humpback Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for epicurus Avatar for grokenstein Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for cwazycajun Avatar for sniffit Avatar for mumon Avatar for jcblues Avatar for pine Avatar for darrtown Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for originalbob Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for omahhum

Continue Discussion