NFL Star Will Be Allowed To Play This Week After Child Injury Indictment

Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson, center, talks with teammate Xavier Rhodes, right, on the sidelines during the second half of an NFL preseason football game against the Arizona Cardinals, Saturday, Aug... Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson, center, talks with teammate Xavier Rhodes, right, on the sidelines during the second half of an NFL preseason football game against the Arizona Cardinals, Saturday, Aug. 16, 2014, in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Ann Heisenfelt) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Minnesota Vikings announced Monday that All-Pro running back Adrian Peterson, who was indicted on child injury charges last week, would be allowed to practice with the team and is expected to play in its next game on Sunday.

“This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing,” the team’s owners said in a statement. “Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.”

The Vikings deactivated Peterson for last Sunday’s game after he was indicted in Montgomery County, Texas, for reckless or negligent injury to a child. He allegedly hit his 4-year-old son with a switch over the summer, according to reports. A doctor who later examined the boy “told investigators that the boy had a number of lacerations on his thighs, along with bruise-like marks on his lower back and buttocks and cuts on his hand,” according to the CBS affiliate in Minneapolis.

“Adrian is a loving father who used his judgment as a parent to discipline his son. He used the same kind of discipline with his child that he experienced as a child growing up in East Texas,” Peterson’s Texas attorney Rusty Hardin said Friday.

The below statement is from owners Zygi and Mark Wilf.

Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.

To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.

We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. He used the same kind of discipline with his child that he experienced as a child growing up in East Texas,"

    God help us.

  2. Hope voters remember this the next time an NFL team wants taxpayers to underwrite the cost of a new stadium.

  3. East Texas discipline also gave us Louie Gohmert.

    STOP, LAWYER. TURN BACK. GO NO FURTHER.

    In other news, these freaking Wilf brothers were also at the top of the food chain investigating the whole Chris Kluwe thing. They promised a full report, and gave one that was slanted hard against America’s Coolest Punter.

    And also half-a-billion in public money for private stadium etc. etc. etc.

  4. That’s how the NFL rolls–torture and slaughter dogs*, beat your kid with a tree branch, get priority treatment and still suit up for game day. If I was a football fan, I’d be finding a new sport to kill time with.
    *after a short stint in jail

  5. If Adrian Peterson was a backup tackle for the Vikings, and not the best player on the team, would he be playing this week? The answer to that question is no, hell no!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

19 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for webcelt Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for Chicago_Bureau Avatar for angelfish Avatar for romath Avatar for micaiah Avatar for leftflank Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for chammy Avatar for sergeant2 Avatar for learning Avatar for KenR4th Avatar for counter_coulter Avatar for msinformed Avatar for horrido Avatar for tomj Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for professorgenius Avatar for sjk Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for ethergnat

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: