ADL: Keith Ellison’s Past Remarks On Israel ‘Disturbing And Disqualifying’

UNITED STATES - JUNE 03: Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., speaks during a news conference with other House democrats at the House triangle to urge Congress to not fast-track the Trans-Pacific Partnership and recognize a ... UNITED STATES - JUNE 03: Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., speaks during a news conference with other House democrats at the House triangle to urge Congress to not fast-track the Trans-Pacific Partnership and recognize a petition signed by 2 million Americans also opposing it, June 3, 2015. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Anti-Defamation League is now speaking out against Rep. Keith Ellison’s (D-MN) candidacy for Democratic National Committee chair, calling his past comments about Israel “disturbing and disqualifying” in a statement released Thursday.

CEO Jonathan A. Greenblatt specifically cited a 2010 speech in which Ellison knocked America’s foreign policy for being to beholden to Israel, comments that bubbled up this week through conservative media outlets.

“The United States foreign policy in the Middle East is governed by what is good or bad through a country of 7 million people,” the ADL’s statement quotes Ellison as saying at the time. “A region of 350 million all turns on a country of 7 million. Does that make sense? Is that logic? Right? When the Americans who trace their roots back to those 350 million get involved, everything changes.”

Greenblatt said that view dredges up “age-old stereotypes” about Jewish people and disqualifies Ellison from the chairmanship.

“Rep. Ellison’s remarks are both deeply disturbing and disqualifying. His words imply that U.S. foreign policy is based on religiously or national origin-based special interests rather than simply on America’s best interests,” the statement reads. “Additionally, whether intentional or not, his words raise the specter of age-old stereotypes about Jewish control of our government, a poisonous myth that may persist in parts of the world where intolerance thrives, but that has no place in open societies like the U.S.”

This is not the first time the ADL has taken issue with Ellison’s past comments about Israel. Greenblatt noted that when Ellison first announced his candidacy for DNC chair, the organization “did not rush to judgment” but did express “real concern” about those other comments.

“We spoke with leadership in the Jewish community in Minnesota who confirmed what ADL and other national organizations have seen: that Keith Ellison is a man of good character,” Greenblatt’s previous statement on his candidacy read. “We have seen him through his work in Congress as an important ally in the fight against anti-Semitism and for civil rights.”

“However, the congressman also has made statements and taken positions, especially regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and on the JCPOA, on which we strongly differ and that concern us,” it continued.

Ellison addressed concerns from the ADL and others in a Medium post Wednesday night, saying that he has learned from his past statements and disavowed leaders with anti-Semitic and homophobic views.

“These men organize by sowing hatred and division, including, anti-Semitism, homophobia and a chauvinistic model of manhood,” Ellison wrote. “I disavowed them long ago, condemned their views, and apologized.”

“I have always lived a politics defined by respecting differences, rejecting all forms of racism and anti-Semitism,” he continued. “A politics based on inclusion, and diverse communities organizing together for economic justice for everyone.”

Latest Livewire
93
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Rep. Keith Ellison’s (R-MN)

    Whaaa? I certainly hope he loses his bid for chair of the DNC, now that he’s switched parties!

  2. I was mystified when I learned Keith had abruptly cancelled a NYT interview after he learned he would be questioned about his association with Reverend Louis Farakhan. Surely, if he had no problem denouncing Farakhan’s anti-Semitism, he wouldn’t have cancelled, right?

  3. “The United States foreign policy in the Middle East is governed by what is good or bad through a country of 7 million people,"


    I

    (No)

    Ummmm

    (No)

    Aside from these half hearted retorts, I’m not to

    (No)

  4. Gah, someone always bests me to it.

  5. Yeah, this article seems rushed. The first two sentences each have a fairly glaring error.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

87 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for mooster Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for impurescience Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for inversion Avatar for sniffit Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for brendanm Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for dm3000 Avatar for henk Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for brd813 Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for zdjh22 Avatar for timbo Avatar for overthefall96 Avatar for tomaspajaros Avatar for jadez Avatar for twirlingfartknocker

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: