You've read 8 articles this month

TPM is funded overwhelmingly by readers’ membership fees. More than 91% of our revenue is derived from memberships and reader contributions. The rest comes from advertising. As a fully independent organization, TPM has no corporate overlords. TPM is not beholden to or controlled by any outside interests. TPM was founded by a journalist and to this day its “business” side is staffed with former journalists whose primary mission is to create a sustainable environment for our reporters and editors to do great work.

Want better media? Support a better media company

  • Reader-funded
  • Unionized
  • Mission-driven

WTF Is Up with Georgia?

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

It caused a bit of a stir when Georgia went into the Toss-Up column in the TPM Electoral Scoreboard. Then it moved to Clinton. And now Hillary Clinton is up 6 points in Georgia in the PollTracker Average. The average is heavily driven by three polls from August which are Clinton +7, Clinton +4 and tie. What’s worth remembering is that while Georgia has been a reliably red state for a generation, the margins haven’t been in the blowout territory like other red states. McCain won the state by 5.2 points in 2008 and Romney won by 7.8 points in 2012. When one candidate is up by a substantial margin, as Clinton is at least for the moment, you’re going to see that across the map. But still: up by 6 points in Georgia. What’s up with that?

First some demographics.

Whites not of Hispanic descent made up 53.9% of the population in 2015. African-Americans 31.7%, Hispanics 9.4% and Asians 4%. Now this is Census data, not the voting population or even the voting age population, and the more diverse population is weighted toward younger Georgians. Still, it’s not like 1980 when the overwhelming majority of Georgians were white with a substantial but still sub-30% minority of African-Americans.

So why is Trump doing this badly at least for the moment? The crosstabs for the three polls aren’t specific or consistent enough to really pin it down. But my supposition is that Trump is underperforming among whites with college degrees. This would match with national data which shows that as the key dividing line in Trump’s white support—whether or not a voter graduated from college.

And it may be born out by this one datapoint.

According to the most recent poll, by JMC Analytics, Trump is clobbering Clinton with white voters, but with a catch. It’s 52% Trump to 25% Clinton. That leaves a lot of folks unaccounted for. Well, 12% are undecided and 10% are with Gary Johnson. (1% are supporting Jill Stein.)

So on the one hand, Trump’s beating Clinton 2 to 1 among white voters. But he’s only barely able to get to a majority of them. Almost a quarter of the white electorate is not with either of the major party candidates. Again, the crosstabs aren’t there to test this hypothesis. The poll sponsored by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution has Clinton beating Trump 47% to 36% among college graduates. But that number isn’t broken out by race. So it’s hard to know what to draw from that.

But that’s my hunch: whites with college degrees who are either Republican or usually vote Republican just don’t seem willing to sign on for Trump, even if not that many are going with Clinton. I’ll be watching to see if there’s more data to see if this is what is happening.

Latest Editors' Blog
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: