“Fuzzball” Ryan

United States House Speaker Paul Ryan (Republican of Wisconsin) delivers a speech on the "State of American Politics" to a bipartisan group of US House interns on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on Wednesday, March 23... United States House Speaker Paul Ryan (Republican of Wisconsin) delivers a speech on the "State of American Politics" to a bipartisan group of US House interns on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on Wednesday, March 23, 2016. In his remarks the Speaker said "Politics can be about a battle of ideas, not insults. It can be about solutions. It can be about making a difference." Credit: Ron Sachs / CNP - NO WIRE SERVICE - Photo by: Ron Sachs/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

We got a new entry into the “fuzzball” Trump endorsement category: Paul Ryan.

But wait, you say, he’s saying he can’t endorse … yet. Please. Let’s go back to the explanation of the “fuzzball” category in the TPM Trump Endorsement Scorecard.

The fuzzball designation is reserved for the many elected officials who are making various nonsensical statements or arguments just to avoid answering the question. They’re fuzzing it up, but generally not well. So for instance, today, Sen Susan Collins says she’ll consider supporting Trump if he starts being nice to people. What?

Admittedly, there were some pointed disagreements among the judges on this one. But here’s the deal. The consensus of the judges is that this is simply a high minded form of obfuscation.

We know who Donald Trump is. You support him or you oppose him. But he’s not going to become a different person over the next few months. Even Marco Rubio could only keep up his “personality transplant” for a week. He might talk differently. He might become less damaging to Republicans or he might improve his chances to win. But he’s not going to change.

Note also that as far as I could tell Ryan was unable or unwilling to point to any specific policy or statement that Trump would need to change or recant to bring the Speaker on board.

This is, as I noted above, a lot of high-falutin nonsense designed to dodge the question.

We welcome your comments on this weighty matter.

Latest Editors' Blog
  • |
    April 25, 2024 12:09 p.m.

    For most of this election season so far, 538 hasn’t surfaced its own presidential race average. Compiling these averages in…

  • |
    April 25, 2024 11:58 a.m.

    Kate chats with TPM’s Josh Kovensky about life inside the courtroom as the Trump hush money trial unfolds. Belaboring The…

  • |
    April 25, 2024 10:04 a.m.

    Kate Riga is liveblogging the Supreme Court oral arguments on Trump’s insane presidential immunity claims here. Josh Kovensky is liveblogging…

  • |
    April 24, 2024 10:43 p.m.

    There’s going to be a lot to talk about tomorrow with these new fake electors indictments out of Arizona. In…

Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: