Report: Top Law Firms Don’t Want To Defend Trump On Russia Probe

President Donald Trump made the statement that the United States is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord, in the Rose Garden of the White House, On Thursday, June 1, 2017. (Photo by Cheriss May) *** Please Use C... President Donald Trump made the statement that the United States is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord, in the Rose Garden of the White House, On Thursday, June 1, 2017. (Photo by Cheriss May) *** Please Use Credit from Credit Field ***(Sipa via AP Images) MORE LESS

Before hiring veteran New York attorney Marc Kasowitz to defend President Donald Trump as the federal investigations into his campaign and administration heat up, the White House knocked on the doors of D.C.’s top tier law firms, only to be turned away.

A new report by Yahoo News lists both the prominent attorneys who have turned down the offer to represent the leader of the free world and their reasons for doing so.

Sources told Yahoo News that the prestigious D.C. lawyers—among them Brendan Sullivan of Williams & Connolly; Ted Olson of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Paul Clement and Mark Filip of Kirkland & Ellis; and Robert Giuffra of Sullivan & Cromwell—fear taking on the president as a client would hurt their firms’ reputations and threaten their ability to recruit clients in the future. “Do I want to be associated with this president and his policies?” one said.

They also expressed concern that “the guy won’t pay and he won’t listen,” referring to the President’s habits of rejecting the advise of his attorneys and advisers and going rogue on a whim, and of dragging his feet on paying legal bills. Some of the attorneys also cited potential conflicts of interest, because they already represent people or companies that have received subpoenas related to the sprawling Russia investigation, in which the FBI and congressional committees are examining everything from off-the-books foreign lobbying to money laundering.

Several former White House attorneys told TPM that they too see the current president as a particularly problematic client.

“He deserves representation. Everybody does. But if I got the telephone call, the answer would be no,” said Lanny Davis, the White House special counsel in charge of political and legal controversies during Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial. “There are people who say, ‘Davis, you’d represent anyone.” But the answer is no, I would not.”

Since leaving the White House, Davis’ list of controversial clients include the dictators of Equatorial Guinea and the Ivory Coast, and Penn State, which he advised on rebuilding its image after its child molestation scandal.

78
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “the guy won’t pay and he won’t listen,” referring to the President’s habits of rejecting the advise of his attorneys and advisers and going rogue on a whim, and of dragging his feet on paying legal bills.

    Ah… the ol’ what goes around comes around…that’s him

  2. Do you blame them? His reputation has proceeded him. If you do business with him, you stand a good chance of not getting paid. :grimacing:

  3. Avatar for clare clare says:

    All of donnie’s history, behavior and practices are catching up to him. You know it’s bad when attorneys want nothing to do with him.

  4. Avatar for drwho drwho says:

    Yes, these attorneys sound smart. Wonder what Trumpy has on Marc K.

  5. OMG, a client too slimy for an attorney to represent? That’s our Donnie!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

72 more replies

Participants

Avatar for bp Avatar for bull_vinkel Avatar for mooster Avatar for mikem42 Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for arrendis Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for jurisgal Avatar for nemo Avatar for dorado Avatar for rb639 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for docd Avatar for news247 Avatar for judygran Avatar for socalista Avatar for maximus Avatar for clare Avatar for jakebarnes Avatar for drwho Avatar for the_loan_arranger

Continue Discussion