WASHINGTON — Republicans just blinked on immigration.
The months-long standoff over President Barack Obama’s executive actions on immigration took a major turn late Monday when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) proposed decoupling funding for the Department of Homeland Security from legislative action against Obama on deportations.
The threat of withholding DHS funding to block Obama’s immigration moves has been the centerpiece of the GOP’s political strategy for months. McConnell’s proposal to de-link them is a sign that he’s trying to find a way out of a battle that GOP leaders in both chambers never really wanted, but which has been pushed by hard-liners within the party.
The DHS funding bill that blocks Obama’s initiatives to shield more than 4 million people from deportation has already passed the House, but McConnell has been unable to overcome a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. McConnell brought it to a vote again Monday afternoon, and for the fourth time Senate Democrats successfully filibustered it.
Moments later, McConnell put legislation on the calendar to overturn Obama’s immigration actions in a standalone manner — separate from DHS funding.
“This looks like a cover vote to eventually pass a clean DHS bill,” said a conservative Republican aide on Capitol Hill, who requested anonymity to criticize the party leader.
The new legislation targets Obama’s immigration initiatives in November 2014 to shield mostly undocumented parents of American citizens from the threat of deportation. Unlike the House-passed bill, it does not target Obama’s 2012 program to protect young people brought to the U.S. illegally as children, the so-called DREAMers.
McConnell said the bill gives Congress “another option we can turn to” for the purpose of funding DHS if Democrats don’t let up in their filibusters.
McConnell’s move is aimed at winning over centrist Democrats like Sens. Joe Manchin (WV) and Claire McCaskill (MO), who oppose Obama’s 2014 executive actions but want to separate them from DHS funding. Manchin recently told TPM he would vote to overturn Obama’s immigration initiatives as a standalone bill but not as part of DHS funding legislation. The White House has promised to veto legislation that rolls back Obama’s executive actions on immigration.
Still, the path forward for Republicans to ward off a DHS shutdown, set to occur on Friday, is murky. Even if Senate Republicans manage to deal with the immigration bill and pass a “clean” DHS bill by then, it’s unclear House Republicans will follow suit. Given the Friday shutdown deadline, it is plausible that Congress will look to a stopgap measure to buy time.
But McConnell’s latest move is the first one by a Republican leader that suggests a way to wind down the battle over immigration, which has animated conservatives for months. The Democratic filibusters and Obama’s veto threats leave Republicans with no good options to confront him.
Meanwhile, a federal judge’s recent move to temporarily halt Obama’s immigration steps gives Republicans some fodder to argue that the fight will continue — albeit in court and not in Congress.
Sen. Chuck Schumer (NY), the No. 3 Senate Democrat, saw McConnell’s move as an step away from conservative demands on immigration, but kept the pressure on him to fund DHS cleanly.
“It’s becoming clear Senator McConnell realizes he must separate himself from the far right, but the bottom line is this proposal doesn’t bring us any closer to actually funding DHS, and Republicans still have no real plan to achieve that goal,” Schumer said in statement. “The order Congress should work in is clear – fund our homeland security, keep DHS open, and then let’s debate immigration.”
First rule in hostage taking:
Totally predictable. The budget is not the place to make policy. No more policy riders in budgets, regardless of which party does it. Debate the policy and vote on it on the record. That should be enshrined into law.
There is a Republican assumption that Democrats are weak and will cave at the first opportunity. Apparently McConnell has figured out that Democrats will stand on principle. He has to decouple or face responsibility for a shutdown and the wrath of the people if there is a terror attack during a shutdown.
Can Boehner reach the same conclusion? I don’t know, maybe his caucus wants the blame if something goes wrong.
This is all fine and dandy (and smart), but won’t the rank and file Republicans in the House just stamp their feet for McConnell undoing what they (and Boehner) put together and then chided the Senate to do its job and deal with it? Won’t this new legislation cleanly funding the DHS require Boehner to do what a large chunk of his caucus won’t allow him to do? Won’t this new legislation require John Boehner to put his balls back in their sack?
Hmm, while interesting, it doesn’t seem likely that any legislation has a chance of decoupling prior to Friday when funding expires. This may be a brief ray of sunshine, but ultimately, it’s going to rain.