House Brief Points Finger Back At Admin In Insider Trading Probe

FILE - In a Dec. 31, 2012, file photo President Barack Obama pauses as he speaks in the South Court Auditorium at the White House in Washington. When President Barack Obama speaks at the University at Buffalo Thur... FILE - In a Dec. 31, 2012, file photo President Barack Obama pauses as he speaks in the South Court Auditorium at the White House in Washington. When President Barack Obama speaks at the University at Buffalo Thursday Aug. 22, 2013, about making college more affordable, supporters of an innovative scholarship program are hoping for a plug. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, file) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House lawyers filed a brief Friday rebuffing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s subpoenas for a GOP staffer and a congressional committee in its investigation into the leak of market-moving information to Wall Street.

And in it, after SEC lawyers had alleged the House aide “may have been” the source of the leaks, congressional counsel pointed the finger back at the Obama administration.

“The SEC purports to be investigating an alleged leak of a particular health care reimbursement rate which, if it occurred at all, must have originated at (the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services),” the House counsel wrote in the brief, which asks a Manhattan federal court to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit to force compliance with the subpoenas.

As TPM has reported, the investigation centers on the leak of a pending policy change by CMS that reversed proposed Medicare funding cuts for private insurers. A flash report was distributed to stock traders before the change was publicly announced, and shares in major insurance companies spiked.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) had implicated administration officials shortly after the leak became public in April 2013. But the tables seemed to have turned last month when SEC and Justice Department subpoenas of the House aide, Brian Sutter, and the Ways and Committee were made public. The SEC alleged that Sutter may have been the source of the leak and that he allegedly spoke on the day of the leak with a lobbyist who reportedly helped distribute the information to Wall Street.

But in their Friday brief arguing that Sutter and the committee should not be required to comply with the SEC subpoenas, House lawyers countered that only administration officials could have had “definitive knowledge” about the policy change that was leaked.

“CMS, of course, is part of the Executive Branch of the federal government (more particularly, part of the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”)),” House counsel wrote in the brief, “and only Executive Branch employees could have had definitive knowledge of the 2014 reimbursement rate for the MA program prior to the April 1, 2013 CMS announcement.”

They also argued as expected that Sutter and the committee were exempt from the subpoenas under the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause. The House’s lawyers also noted that the SEC had not formally accused Sutter of wrongdoing and that the Justice Department had withdrawn its own subpoena for Sutter after the House counsel offered information on behalf of Sutter, as TPM had reported.

The SEC received the same information, the House attorneys said, but has continued pressing forward with the subpoenas, suggesting that the inquiry is “more about making headlines and less about obtaining information pertinent to any viable investigation,” they wrote.

“This sort of unsubstantiated effort to tarnish Mr. Sutter is reprehensible and wholly unbecoming an agency of the United States government,” they wrote. “Mr. Sutter was not a source for anyone’s material non-public information.”

House Brief SEC Subpoena

Latest DC
52
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The party of personal responsibility once again reveals its true face.

  2. And how does the House point the finger at Obama, which is what the headline states?

  3. They sure love to dish it out, but they sure can’t take it.

  4. The mid-term elections are less than 4 months away. No wonder the GOP is pointing at the Obama administration.

  5. “The SEC purports to be investigating an alleged leak of a particular health care reimbursement rate which, if it occurred at all, must have originated at (the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services),” the House counsel wrote in the brief, which asks a Manhattan federal court to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit to force compliance with the subpoenas.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

46 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for ajm Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for leesid Avatar for romath Avatar for oz3472 Avatar for avattoir Avatar for chammy Avatar for trippin Avatar for enon Avatar for ctvoter Avatar for colbatguano Avatar for doctorbiobrain Avatar for condew Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for labman57 Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for radgal70 Avatar for theworm Avatar for sfaw Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for lemmitellya Avatar for 62fender

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: