Harry Reid Threatens To Revisit ‘Nuclear Option’ On Filibuster Rules

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In his first remarks after the July 4 holiday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) on Monday threatened to revisit the so-called nuclear option to make further changes to the filibuster rules.

He launched a broadside on the GOP’s ongoing efforts to “put up roadblock after roadblock” in the confirmation of nominees. Republicans have used up maximum debate time for most nominees to delay a final confirmation vote, even those who are ultimately confirmed with broad or unanimous support.

“We changed some of the rules. We didn’t change that,” Reid said of the Senate’s November rules change that required a simple majority to confirm all nominees except the Supreme Court. “If they’re going to continue this, maybe we’ll have to take another look at that. Just, it’s outrageous what they’ve done.”

What Reid is threatening here is a further weakening of the filibuster by limiting the minority’s ability to force lengthy debates on nominations. Existing rules allow for up to 30 hours of debate on cabinet nominations and circuit judges, and 8 hours on sub-cabinet nominations.

“They can stall for many, many hours,” he said. “There’s no other way to look at what they’re doing. This is obstruction for obstruction’s sake.”

Reid said Republicans are throwing a “temper tantrum” because they’re still upset that President Barack Obama handily won reelection. “They’re doing this to make the president look bad, make us look bad,” he said. “It’s to run out the clock.”

The Democratic leader’s remarks come as 145 nominations are pending on the Senate calendar, and control of the chamber is up for grabs in the Nov. 4 elections. Democrats fear that Republicans could grind Obama’s executive and judicial nominees to a halt if they win the majority. Progressive advocates have been urging him to change the rules again and limit debate time to make sure Obama nominees with majority support in the Senate can be confirmed quickly.

Reid said on Monday the Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is “playing a very dangerous game at the expense of this country.”

In May, Obama took the unusual step of weighing in on the debate, calling on the Senate to change “how a filibuster works.”

(Photo credit: AP, edited by TPM’s Christopher O’Driscoll)

Latest DC
41
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for bdtex bdtex says:

    Please proceed.

  2. Avatar for dnl dnl says:

    Harry

    Just push the button…

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    How about if you filibuster proceedings on someone you subsequently vote for, you don’t get to vote on the next nomination? (Nah, that wouldn’t work, it would just lead to the loons voting against everybody.)

  4. When Harry? January 4th 2015? January 21st 2017? Now might be nice.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

35 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bdtex Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for druid800 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for sooner Avatar for mymy Avatar for leftflank Avatar for chammy Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for tallyjohnson Avatar for enon Avatar for ctvoter Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for iheardthisbefore Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for neal_anderthal Avatar for breccia Avatar for bigdaddydrj Avatar for melbo58 Avatar for darrtown Avatar for Libs Avatar for 62fender

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: