This Week: Some Mueller Staffers Feel Barr Misled On ‘Alarming’ Obstruction Evidence
Robert Mueller’s notoriously airtight ship has sprung a leak — or several. NBC, The New York Times and the Washington Post all reported this week that former members of Mueller’s team are expressing deep frustration with how Attorney General Bill Barr has characterized their findings. In particular, the evidence they presented on obstruction was “alarming and significant”—“much more acute than Barr suggested,” as one person told the Post. Mueller also presented substantial findings on Russia’s effort to influence the Trump campaign and on the unusual contacts between the two parties. Another red flag: Barr did not disclose that Mueller’s team had prepared multiple summaries of distinct elements of the report that were reportedly intended for prompt public release. The Justice Department pushed back, saying that all of the documents received from Mueller’s office were flagged as potentially containing secret grand jury information. The department also argued Barr didn’t want to release the report in a “serial or piecemeal fashion.” Democratic…
Already a member? SIGN IN
This story is only available for TPM Members. Interested in reading exclusive analysis and reporting from TPM’s award-winning staff?
Sign up now and the first month is just ONE DOLLAR
Are you a student or experiencing financial hardship?
We offer FREE membership to those in need