Trump’s Lawyers Respond To Latest Offer From Special Counsel

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, special counsel on the Russian investigation, leaves following a meeting with members of the US Senate Judiciary Committee at the US Capitol in Washington, DC on June 21, 2017. / A... Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, special counsel on the Russian investigation, leaves following a meeting with members of the US Senate Judiciary Committee at the US Capitol in Washington, DC on June 21, 2017. / AFP PHOTO / SAUL LOEB (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for President Donald Trump said they have responded to the latest interview proposal from special counsel Robert Mueller, part of a months-long negotiation process over whether and how investigators can question the president on possible obstruction of justice in the Russia investigation.

The two sides have gone back and forth over the scope and conditions of an interview as Mueller looks to understand whether the president acted with a criminal intent to stymie the investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and Russia.

Mueller’s team has put forward dozens of potential questions for the president, including about his firing of FBI Director James Comey last year and his public antagonism of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who recused himself from the Russia investigation against the president’s wishes.

Though he’s publicly railed against the Russia investigation, including earlier this week, Trump has said he’s willing to be questioned. His lawyers have been far more hesitant and have challenged the right of investigators to interview Trump about actions they say he is authorized under the Constitution to take, such as firing an FBI director.

Speaking on his radio show Wednesday, Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow again expressed reservations about an interview with Mueller, saying it would set a “bad precedent to allow just unfettered questioning on that process.”

“The decisions that are made here are all about the Constitution of the United States,” Sekulow said.

Trump’s lawyers did not detail the terms of any counteroffer they may have made and they also did not suggest that they were close to agreeing to an interview, suggesting the possibility of additional negotiations.

Sekulow said he expected Mueller’s team to take time to evaluate the written response.
“These are not two paragraphs,” Sekulow said. “These are well-thought-out legal positions that, as I’ve said multiple times, have implications not just for this president but for any presidency.”

Rudy Giuliani, another lawyer for Trump, also declined to go into detail during an appearance Wednesday night on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity.” He said Trump’s team had offered Mueller “an opportunity to do a form of questioning.”

Giuliani said Mueller “knows the answers to every question that he wants to ask” Trump and speculated that the special counsel wants to “trap him into perjury.”

Earlier, Giuliani said millions of pages of documents have been provided to Mueller along with testimony from dozens of witnesses.

“We’re re-stating what we have been saying for months: It is time for the Office of Special Counsel to conclude its inquiry without further delay.”

It is not clear what would happen if Trump’s lawyers definitively reject Mueller’s interview request. Mueller’s team raised the prospect in March that it could subpoena the president, though this would unquestionably prompt a court fight.

The Supreme Court ruled in 1974 that President Richard Nixon could be forced to turn over recordings that had been subpoenaed.

“Ultimately this decision is the president’s to make,” Sekulow said on his radio show during a conversation with Giuliani. “We’re going to give advice, but the president is going to make this decision.”

The negotiations unfold as Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, stands trial in federal court in Virginia on financial crime charges. Manafort is one of four former Trump aides to be charged in the Mueller investigation.

10
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. It is obvious that the president has already made his decision. He will not come in for questioning. He will just keep up the facade that he wants to sit down with the Special Counsel, all the while having his legal team put on the show we have seen for eight months now. Delay. Delay. Delay. In order to water down the investigation.

  2. No questions about:
    (1) Collusion;
    (2) Obstruction of Justice.
    And
    (3) No “perjury traps”!
    (3) encompasses (1) and (2) (and for that matter, just about any question beyond “state your name for the record”).
    It’s subpoena time, and that’s why Mueller went through this exercise to create a record.
    The GOP better hope the SC doesn’t hold for Trump, because that would end the hopes of any witch hunt against a future Democratic President.

  3. Giuliani said Mueller “knows the answers to every question that he wants to ask” Trump and speculated that the special counsel wants to “trap him into perjury.”

    There is a very easy way to avoid “perjury traps”, just don’t lie all the time. Of course for Trump that is impossible. Lying is like breathing for him, he does it without even thinking about it.

  4. This is the thing that I find so ludicrous about all of this: you cannot perjure yourself by telling the truth.

    With every single repetition of this pathetic excuse, Ghouliani & Co imply, if not outright confirm, that Spankee is a pathological, chronic liar and that he cannot be trusted to tell the truth.

  5. I have to wonder for some one who lies all the time if he can even remember the truth? Or is it every time he lies he is reshaping his reality, and so no longer can tell the difference?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for lastroth Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for riverstreet Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for atrainedmonkey Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for lizzymom

Continue Discussion