The Trump Administration Used Its Food Aid Program for Political Gain, Congressional Investigators Find

The Food to Families program, touted by Ivanka Trump, gave tens of millions of dollars to unqualified firms and was also used to promote then-President Trump.
WOODBRIDGE, VIRGINIA - DECEMBER 14: Dave Donaldson of CityServe (R) and Ivanka Trump, U.S. President Donald Trump's daughter, carries a Farmers to Families Food Box at Christ Church on December 14, 2020 in Woodbridge... WOODBRIDGE, VIRGINIA - DECEMBER 14: Dave Donaldson of CityServe (R) and Ivanka Trump, U.S. President Donald Trump's daughter, carries a Farmers to Families Food Box at Christ Church on December 14, 2020 in Woodbridge, Virginia. The boxes contained fresh fruits and vegetables, dairy products, and meat products from American producers. (Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

This story first appeared at ProPublica. ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

A $6 billion federal program created to provide fresh produce to families affected by the pandemic was mismanaged and used by the Trump administration for political gain, a new congressional report has found.

As a ProPublica investigation revealed last spring and as the new report further details, the Farmers to Families Food Box program gave contracts to companies that had no relevant experience and often lacked necessary licenses. The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, which released its report last week, found that former President Donald Trump’s administration did not adequately screen contractor applications or identify red flags in bid proposals.

One company that received a $39 million contract was CRE8AD8 LLC (pronounced “Create a Date”), a wedding and event planning firm. The owner compared the contract to his usual work of “putting tchotchkes in a bag.”

In response to the report, the firm’s CEO said in a statement, “We delivered far more boxes/pounds than many other contractors and as a for-profit company, we’re allowed to make a profit.”

The congressional report also highlighted the application of an avocado grower who was initially awarded a $40 million contract before it was canceled after a review. Under the section of the application that required applicants to list references, the farmer wrote, “I don’t have any.”

The Food to Families program was created by the Department of Agriculture in the early days of the pandemic to give away produce that might have otherwise gone to waste as a result of disruptions in distribution chains. The boxes included produce, milk, dairy and cooked meats — and many also included a signed letter from then-President Trump.

The program was unveiled in May 2020 by Ivanka Trump. “I’m not shy about asking people to step up to the plate,” the president’s older daughter said in an interview to promote the initiative.

According to congressional investigators, Ivanka Trump was involved in getting the letter from her father added to the boxes. The USDA told contractors that including the letter was mandatory. Food bank operators told the investigators the letter concerned them because it didn’t appear to be politically neutral.

On the first day of the Republican National Convention in August 2020, President Trump and his daughter headlined a nearby event to announce an additional $1 billion for the food box program. Then-Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue also spoke at the event and encouraged attendees to reelect the president.

A federal ethics office later found that Perdue’s speech violated a federal law that prohibits officials from using their office for campaign purposes. The USDA at the time disputed the notion that Perdue was electioneering, saying that Perdue’s comments merely “predicted future behavior based on the president’s focus on helping ‘forgotten people.’”

The yearlong congressional investigation also identified problems with the deliveries themselves, including food safety issues, failed deliveries and uneven food distribution. Some contractors also forced recipient organizations to accept more food than they could distribute or store.

Committee chair Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., said in a statement that the mismanagement of the program is another example of the previous administration’s failures.

“The Program was marred by a structure that prioritized industry over families, by contracting practices that prioritized cutting corners over competence, and by decisions that prioritized politics over the public good,” he said.

ProPublica also found that the Trump administration hired a lobbyist to counter the criticism that contracts were going to unqualified contractors.

President Joe Biden ended the program in May.

Representatives of the former president did not respond to a request for comment.

Notable Replies

  1. Just one of many crimes committed by this criminal operation.

  2. What didn’t they use for political and/or financial gain?

    The concept of public service is as foreign to that family and that maladministration as calculus is to a tapeworm.

  3. Avatar for davcbr davcbr says:

    “I’m not shy about asking people to step up to the plate,”
    One way of handing responsibility to others.

  4. Avatar for hoagie hoagie says:

    Always thinking the Treasury was their personal bank account. OUR MONEY.

  5. Avatar for bodie1 bodie1 says:

    They thought it meant the public served them.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

29 more replies

Participants

Avatar for fgs Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for epicurus Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for callmeeric Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for davcbr Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for mrf Avatar for hoagie Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for rickjones Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for brian512 Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for lanabill Avatar for rogerhead Avatar for timbomov Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: