Supreme Court Rejects Challenge Of Senate Filibuster Rules

FILE - In this April 9, 2010 file photo, the Supreme Court is seen in Washington. The Supreme Court is debating whether young teenagers convicted of killing someone may be locked up for life with no chance of parole,... FILE - In this April 9, 2010 file photo, the Supreme Court is seen in Washington. The Supreme Court is debating whether young teenagers convicted of killing someone may be locked up for life with no chance of parole, the latest in a line of cases seeking a second chance for young people. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from a public interest group and four members of Congress who challenged the Senate filibuster as unconstitutional.

The justices let stand a lower court ruling that said Common Cause and the lawmakers did not have legal standing to pursue the case.

The plaintiffs argued that Senate rules requiring at least 60 votes to bring legislation to a vote violates the constitutional principle of majority rule. A federal appeals court said the lawsuit was filed against the wrong parties.

The case was brought against Vice President Joe Biden in his role as president of the Senate, and against the Senate’s secretary, parliamentarian and sergeant at arms.

Common Cause says it can’t sue the Senate directly because that is barred under the Constitution’s Speech and Debate Clause.

Last year, the Senate voted to end use of the filibuster rule from blocking most presidential nominees. Democrats said they ended the rule out of frustration that Republicans were routinely using the tactic to block President Barack Obama’s nominees for pivotal judgeships and other top jobs.

But 60 votes are still required to end filibusters against legislation.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

5
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The US Constitution give both houses of Congress the power to make their own rules.

    It doesn’t exclude anything in that clause.

  2. If Republicans win the senate…does anyone for a minute think they will allow Democrats to filibuster like they did? They will do away with the whole thing.

  3. Wait for it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for scottnatlanta Avatar for gingercloud Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for thunderclapnewman

Continue Discussion