New Michigan Law Allows Adoption Agencies To Reject LBGT Families

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder is seen after signing egislation to provide state funding for Detroit municipal pensions as part of city's bankruptcy process during a ceremony at the refurbished Globe Building in Detroit, ... Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder is seen after signing egislation to provide state funding for Detroit municipal pensions as part of city's bankruptcy process during a ceremony at the refurbished Globe Building in Detroit, Friday, June 20, 2014. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio) MORE LESS

UPDATE: June 11, 2015, 1:32 PM EDT

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Gov. Rick Snyder on Thursday signed a law letting private adoption agencies with state contracts decline to participate in referrals against their religious beliefs, despite criticism that it amounts to government-sanctioned discrimination against gay couples.

The Republican told The Associated Press that the legislation codifies an existing practice within the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, which relies on private agencies to help find temporary or permanent homes for 13,000 children in foster care at any given time.

“This is about making sure we get the largest number of kids in forever families,” Snyder said in a phone interview. “The more opportunities and organizations we have that are doing a good job of placing people in loving families, isn’t that better for all of us?”

Only two other states, Virginia and North Dakota, have laws that are explicit in allowing private adoption agencies to turn away prospective parents for religious reasons.

Snyder acted a day after the bills cleared the GOP-controlled Legislature almost entirely along party lines. Opponents compared the legislation to a religious objections law in Indiana that had to be softened after a backlash.

The Michigan Catholic Conference and others have lobbied for the legislation for years, but it has gained traction ahead of the U.S. Supreme Court’s expected ruling on gay marriage in the coming weeks. In 2011, Illinois ended long-standing contracts with Catholic Charities to provide foster care and adoptions because of the group’s practice of referring unmarried couples to other agencies.

Under Michigan’s law, an agency with religious objections to a prospective adoption will have to refer an applicant to another “willing and able” agency or to a state website listing other providers.

The measure specifies that child-placing agencies do not have to provide services in conflict with their “sincerely held” religious beliefs, meaning they can decline a referral for foster care management or adoption services without fear of an “adverse action” by the state or local governments.

Private agencies — which received $19.9 million from the state for adoption services in the last fiscal year — will be able to cite the law as a defense in judicial or administrative proceedings. If they decline to provide services, they must give applicants a written list of other adoption or foster care providers.

___

Follow David Eggert on Twitter at http://twitter.com/

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

11
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. What is there are no other willing and able agencies that want to be known as the one agency that deals with - you know, those people? So the Republican-controlled Legislature has no problem with the idea of children languishing in the adoption system until they eventually reach an age where they are no longer adoptable?

  2. Look at that, people: the smiley face of unbelievable cruelty and bigotry.

    Fuck you, you ¨one tough nerd¨.

    Fuck you.

    ETA: On behalf of all the same-sex parents I know who are doing a wonderful job raising adopted kids, and on behalf of those kids and the homes they were fortunate to find, let me say it again:

    Fuck you, Rick Snyder.

  3. Today’s GOP: Because nothing says “Family Values” like not valuing families.

  4. Avatar for sean sean says:

    Why are Republican politicians such hateful people?

    This needs to be challenged in court - either those faith based agencies don’t take state funds and get to discriminate; OR they find away to put their hate aside if they take state funds. But I don’t see how this is constitutional. State funded discrimination?

  5. Sure, take it out on the kids. I’m so sick and tired of the GOP’s bullshit.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

5 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for sean Avatar for meta

Continue Discussion