Scott Wildly (And Falsely) Claims COVID Relief Bill Will Hurt Poor Families Amid Scattered GOP Response

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 05: U.S. Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 5, 2021 in Washington, DC. The Senate continues to debate the latest COVID-19 relief bill. (Photo by... WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 05: U.S. Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 5, 2021 in Washington, DC. The Senate continues to debate the latest COVID-19 relief bill. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Congressional Republicans are staunchly opposed to the COVID-19 relief package that is poised to pass the House early this afternoon. But they’re less unified as to why. 

Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) came out swinging on Tuesday with perhaps the most disingenuous argument against it yet. 

“Who hurts, gets hurt? Poor families,” Scott said on Fox News. “They’re not helping poor families with this, they’re hurting poor families.” 

The package is directly targeted at low-income people and families, and researchers have already found that it will profoundly lower the poverty rate. Columbia University’s Center on Poverty and Social Policy found that it would halve child poverty and reduce adult poverty by a quarter. A new study from the Urban Institute found that the package would reduce the overall poverty rate in 2021 by more than a third, specifically lowering the rate by 42 percent for Black people, 39 percent for Hispanic people and 34 percent for white people.  

While Scott’s may be the most blatantly false attack, Republicans have been all over the map in their half-hearted attempts to characterize it as bad. 

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) took the floor Wednesday during the debate on the bill to bemoan it as “socialist,” a “laundry list of left-wing priorities.”

Rep. John Yarmuth (D-KY), who took the floor directly afterwards, dismissed the leader’s “scare tactics.” 

“If Democrats had a potluck picnic, Republicans would call it socialism,” he quipped to laughter in the chamber. 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), who forced a brief procedural delay in the bill’s final vote Wednesday morning, based her opposition broadly on the package being a “massive woke progressive Democrat wishlist.”

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) took the more classic GOP approach, attacking the bill as wasteful spending. 

“I think it’s important for the American people and our Democratic colleagues to recognize that when they’re going to propose spending money that’s not needed and that’s wasteful, and they lard up a piece of legislation, that we’re not going to just sit back and take it — that we’re going to fight back,” he told reporters last week. 

Republicans’ knee-jerk but unfocused attacks on the bill belie its bipartisan popularity. A Morning Consult poll published Wednesday shows that 75 percent of registered voters — including 59 percent of Republicans and 90 percent of Democrats — support the package. 

Democrats have been touting the “bipartisan” nature of the bill despite its lack of congressional Republican support, citing its popularity with Republican voters and some state-level GOP lawmakers across the country.

The package is expected to pass in the House, primarily if not entirely on the back of the Democratic majority, Wednesday afternoon.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. They have nothing but lies … and they hope you are as stupid as they think you are…

  2. Avatar for jinnj jinnj says:

    what a deceitful worm - his whole career Scott has specialized in hurting poor families!

  3. TBF: Poor families will probably just spend all the money on food, and rent, rather than investing it in Fraudulent Medicare Billing Schemes, which have a much higher rate of return.

  4. Did he bother to say how the bill hurt’s poor people?

    Republicans are flailing and flailing badly.

  5. Uber medicare fraudster sheds unidentifiable-reptile tears for the poor.

Continue the discussion at

81 more replies


Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for sysprog Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for dont Avatar for danny Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for hoagie Avatar for pine Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jinnj Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for brian512 Avatar for maximus Avatar for euglena4056 Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for skeptical Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for osprey Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for ClutchCargo

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: