WARSAW, Poland (AP) — A spokeswoman for Poland’s prime minister sought Sunday to downplay his words equating Polish collaborators in the Holocaust to alleged “Jewish perpetrators” by saying the remark was an invitation to a frank debate about World War II crimes against Jews.
Israeli politicians accused Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki of anti-Semitism after his comment Saturday at the Munich Security Conference, raising the temperature of a diplomatic dispute over Poland’s new law banning some statements about the Holocaust.
Morawiecki and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had their second telephone conversation in three weeks Sunday and agreed to work together to soothe the intense feelings about World War II history in both countries.
Netanyahu’s office said he told Morawiecki that “a comparison between the activities of Poles and the activities of Jews during the Holocaust is unfounded.”
In a sign of the tensions between the two nations, someone painted black swastikas, expletives and the word “murderer” on the entrance to Poland’s Embassy in Tel Aviv, Israeli police said Sunday. They have launched an investigation.
Morawiecki made the comment as he was responding to an Israeli journalist’s question about the new Polish law, which criminalizes falsely blaming Poles for Holocaust crimes that were committed by Nazi Germany during its occupation of Poland. The journalist said his parents’ families were reported to the Nazis by Polish neighbors and asked if he would be charged if he had related the story in Poland.
“Of course it’s not going to be punishable, not going to be seen as criminal, to say that there were Polish perpetrators, as there were Jewish perpetrators, as there were Russian perpetrators, as there were Ukrainian, not only German perpetrators,” Morawiecki said in response.
The spokeswoman for Poland’s conservative ruling party, Beata Mazurek, insisted that Morawiecki “told the truth that is difficult for the Israeli side to accept.”
“There is no need to apologize for telling the truth,” Mazurek said.
The president of the World Jewish Congress, Ronald S. Lauder, issued a statement demanding an “immediate retraction and apology” from Poland. Lauder said that putting Jews in the same category as the other nationalities was “nothing short of an attempt to falsify history that rings of the very worst forms of anti-Semitism and Holocaust obfuscation.”
Morawiecki spokeswoman Joanna Kopcinska said the prime minister’s comment “should be interpreted as a sincere call for open discussion of crimes committed against Jews during the Holocaust, regardless of the nationality of those involved in each crime.”
In a statement provided in Polish and English, the spokeswoman said Morawiecki’s response to the journalist’s question was “by no means intended to deny the Holocaust.”
Morawiecki “has repeatedly and categorically opposed denial of the Holocaust — the murder of European Jewry — as well as anti-Semitism in all its forms,” the statement said.
It also noted that the brutal occupation of Poland by Nazi Germany during the war “allowed the Nazi German murder of Jews to take place in the way that it did.”
The spokesman for Polish President Andrzej Duda said the strong reaction in Israel “should not be ignored” but also attributed it partly to internal political tensions in that country. The spokesman, Krzysztof Lapinski, said Morawiecki’s reply was in Poland’s interest and meant to explain the new law.
Poland’s conservative government has said the law is needed to protect Poland from being slandered for crimes committed by Nazi Germans that took place during the 1939-45 occupation and to make the wartime suffering of Poles clear to the world. Poland lost six million citizens during the war, half of them Jews.
Like Anne Frank?
Disgusting.
Who knew history was based on feelings?
Right? Apparently for the conservatives of the world, feelings, whims, and fantasies
arising from either paranoia or propaganda are more and more often replacing not only history, but the reality of the present and what science posits to be the likely future.
This asshole now wants to debate the virtue of Anne Frank?