North Dakota Bans Common Second-Trimester Abortion Procedure

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum (R-ND) speaks during a press conference announcing plans for the clean up of the Oceti Sakowin protest camp on February 22, 2017 in Mandan, North Dakota. (Photo by Stephen Yang/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota Republican Gov. Doug Burgum signed legislation Wednesday that makes it a crime for a doctor performing a second-trimester abortion to use instruments such as clamps, scissors and forceps to remove the fetus from the womb.

The bill that passed easily in the GOP-led Legislature last month outlaws the abortion practice known as dilation and evacuation — the most commonly used procedure in second-trimester abortions, according to the New York-based Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights research organization.

The bill uses the non-medical term “human dismemberment abortion” and is graphic in describing the procedure.

Except in cases of an emergency, doctors performing the procedure would be charged with a felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The measure says the woman having the abortion would not face charges.

Abortion-rights groups argue that banning the procedure is unconstitutional because it interferes with private medical decisions.

State Health Department data shows the procedure has not been reported in North Dakota since 2015, when eight such abortions were performed.

Laws banning the procedure are on the books in Mississippi and West Virginia. Similar laws are on hold because of legal challenges in Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas.

In December, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which includes North Dakota, heard oral arguments over a judge’s decision to block Arkansas from enforcing its law.

North Dakota has one abortion provider, the Red River Women’s Clinic in Fargo. Clinic director Tammi Kromenaker has said her facility’s lawyers would wait for a decision in the Arkansas case before deciding on possible legal challenges to North Dakota’s legislation.

The abortion measure was the second signed by Burgum (pictured above). Last month, he signed a bill that requires abortion providers to tell women undergoing drug-induced abortions that it’s possible they could still have a live birth if they change their mind.

Opponents say there is no medically accepted evidence that a drug-induced abortion can be interrupted.

Burgum’s spokesman, Mike Nowatzki, announced the governor signed the bill late Wednesday in a single-sentence email. He said the governor would have no comment on the signing.

Before running for office, Burgum, a wealthy former software executive, had been critical of the Legislature’s stance on social issues, though he has walked a fine line on abortion in the highly conservative state and has been clearly uncomfortable addressing the topic.

In his first gubernatorial debate, Burgum did not take a position on abortion, saying he preferred allowing North Dakotans to vote on abortion issues, instead of the Legislature. After criticism from an opponent, he said in a later debate he would’ve supported some of the nation’s toughest abortion laws passed in North Dakota in 2013, including one that would have banned abortions when a fetal heartbeat can be detected, something that can happen before a woman knows she is pregnant.

That law never went into effect after the state’s lone abortion clinic filed a successful lawsuit. North Dakota spent $326,000 to unsuccessfully defend the law and paid the clinic $245,000 in a settlement.

Former Republican Gov. Jack Dalrymple called it “a legitimate attempt by a state Legislature to discover the boundaries of Roe v. Wade.” GOP majority leaders at the time also defended spending taxpayer money on the lawsuits.

Latest News
64
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election was last week. #supposedlypocketbookissuesmattermore

  2. Avatar for tena tena says:

    They’ve been on a tear. The Texas Leg Judiciary Committee held a 2 hour hearing today on a GOP bill to make abortion a capital offense. They want to execute women for having abortions.

    Ohio passed the fetal heartbeat bill.

    It’s like the GOP lined up and made a series of Hail Mary passes - it’s all they got.

  3. Can’t wait for the miscarriage laws. All miscarriages should be investigated as a potential murder case under this.

  4. Why wait for miscarriages?

    The rule should be applied to all menstrual periods: if you have one, you’re a murderer.

    Of course, by that argument one might have to write in an exception for male masturbation.

  5. You do mean if you miss one, I presume. I’m on the record as saying that we need a National Period Registry (NPR-- can just steal the acronym as we cut all that funding), with mandated reporting from all females of child-bearing age.

    Without proof that each woman has had her period, or missed one, how would you ever enforce the fetal heartbeat laws?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

58 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for paulw Avatar for sandi Avatar for silvrfox Avatar for davitydave Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for cervantes Avatar for inversion Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for lastroth Avatar for kitty Avatar for tena Avatar for lemmitellya Avatar for bkmn Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for nycabj Avatar for georgial1beral Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for godwit Avatar for rascal_crone

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: