JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri’s top election official on Thursday said the state is appealing a judge’s ruling that blocked enforcement of parts of a voter photo identification law, adding that the ruling is causing “mass confusion” as the marquee Missouri U.S. Senate election approaches.
Republican Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft in a statement said the state attorney general has appealed the ruling and asked it to be put on hold as that process plays out.
At issue is Senior Cole County Circuit Judge Richard Callahan’s recent ruling striking down a requirement that a voter lacking a valid photo ID must sign a sworn statement and present some other form of identification in order to cast a regular ballot. Callahan also blocked the state from advertising that a photo ID is required to vote.
Ashcroft said there’s confusion because Callahan’s ruling “directs the STATE not to use the statement.” But Ashcroft said it’s local election authorities who would have been responsible for requesting voters without proper photo identification to sign an affidavit, “so it is not clear if they are bound by the judge’s decision.”
“The judge’s decision has injected mass confusion into the voting process just weeks before an important election – an action the courts historically and purposely have not taken,” Ashcroft said, adding that many local election authorities already had trained poll workers to require voters to sign a sworn statement.
Callahan’s ruling came as voters are preparing for a Nov. 6 election headlined by the race between Democratic U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill and Republican challenger, Attorney General Josh Hawley, whose office is defending the state law on behalf of Ashcroft.
Strategist Symone Sanders of Priorities USA, a Washington-based liberal advocacy group that sued on behalf of some Missouri voters, in a statement praised Callahan’s ruling and criticized the photo ID law as having “required voters to sign a threatening and confusing affidavit to receive a regular ballot if they didn’t have photo identification.”
“What’s confusing is the Secretary of State’s support of limiting access to the ballot box,” she said.
Missouri’s 2016 law was enacted when the Republican-led Legislature overrode the veto of then-Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat. Voters in 2016 also approved a constitutional amendment intended to permit photo identification laws. The Missouri law was not yet in effect for the 2016 elections.
Voter photo ID requirements have been pushed by Republicans in numerous states as a means of preventing fraud. They have been opposed by Democrats who contend such laws can disenfranchise poor, elderly, disabled and minority voters who are less likely to have photo IDs.
Not really.
Agree. Nothing confusing about his actions. They are clear in their intent: make it as difficult as possible for low-income and/or minority citizens to exercise their right to the ballot. Sickening that voting rights has become a partisan issue but it is just one facet of GOP efforts to retain power against the wishes of the majority of the electorate.
“What’s confusing is the Secretary of State’s support of limiting access to the ballot box,”
LOL…no it’s not. Four words explain everything when you’re asking “why” about any of this GOP nonsense: “because white Christian nationalism.”
say it with me
“BECAUSE WHITE CHRISTIAN NATIONALISM”
The GOP’s behavior begins and ends there. So does our country apparently.
Isn’t it odd that a state like mine (NY) seems to have little or no problems with voter fraud in spite of not requiring us to show a photo ID?
She understands. She just wanted to get the statement in so that maybe voters will start to understand.