ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Minnesota’s Democratic governor said Wednesday that the Affordable Care Act is “no longer affordable,” a stinging critique from a state leader who strongly embraced the law just a few years ago.
Gov. Mark Dayton made the comments while addressing questions about Minnesota’s fragile health insurance market, where individual plans are facing double-digit increases after all insurers threatened to exit the market entirely in 2017.
They follow cost concerns and criticism nationwide, including President Bill Clinton saying last week that the law was “the craziest thing in the world” before he backtracked.
“The reality is the Affordable Care Act is no longer affordable for increasing numbers of people,” Dayton said, calling on Congress to fix the law to address rising costs and market stability.
The Democrat-driven criticism has emboldened Republicans in Minnesota and nationwide to try to scrap President Barack Obama’s 2009 law. Clinton faced backlash for his comments during a Michigan rally for his wife last week, and he later clarified his support for the law and called for fixes to address gaps in coverage.
Few states embraced the health care law stronger than Minnesota under Dayton, where lawmakers created a state-run online market exchange for shoppers who aren’t covered by employers or public programs to buy individual coverage. When those policies first went on sale in 2013, Dayton and state officials proudly touted the lowest health insurance rates in the nation.
But after several years of steadily increasing premiums, top state regulators said this fall that Minnesota’s individual market is in “a state of emergency.” The state scrambled to stop all seven companies that sell insurance directly to consumers or through the state exchange, MNsure, from fleeing for 2017, but the state’s largest insurer is still exiting.
Health care insurance shoppers will see premium increases that range from 50 percent to 67 percent on their plans for next year.
Across the nation, insurers have sought double-digit premium increases while major companies — including Aetna and UnitedHealth — have pulled out of many state-based exchanges for 2017, after forecasting heavy financial losses. The Obama administration portrays the premium increases as a one-year market correction that can be absorbed or offset by larger financial help through tax credits.
Minnesota lawmakers are mulling potential fixes to get costs under control and ensure the individual market can survive. While Dayton said that’s worth considering, he said the bulk of the problem lies at the federal level.
“It’s got some serious blemishes right now and serious deficiencies,” he said.
___
Follow Kyle Potter on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/kpottermn
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
I live in CA, am 62, and my premiums have not budged these past two years. I adore my Obama care. Is there something MN should be doing differently?
My bet is that CA has stricter insurance regulations. For example, CA is one of few states with policies banning Transgender exclusions in both private insurance and Medicaid coverage.
Everyone nationally should watch Colorado’s Single Payer Health Care Law Program up for passage / voting in November, the first such state or federal bill in the USA. We still have the Citizens’ Initiative policy here in Colorado which allows citizens to offer bills for passage outside the state congress, a serious power against the 1% greed machine. However, not surprisingly, the right wing CO legislature is taking steps to get rid of this powerful democratic tool. Nevertheless, we still have time to pass single payer health care in Colorado which would make the rest of the states’ and feds’ politicians look exactly like what they are: greedy dishonest politicians. Europe has had single payer health coverage for all citizens, and even visitors / tourists, since the 1960s! And you can imagine how the horrible health care industry is fighting back with dishonesty and lies, as usual, in their advertising / actions.
My health insurance (employer-based) went up by $5/month this year, to $32/month including dental and eye care. First bump in 6 years. I wonder if the insurance companies are sticking it to individual purchasers so they can “show” how bad the ACA is, while leaving company plans mostly alone so the old system - which was “be rich, be on medicare/medicaid, or get it through your employer” - looks better by comparison.
An important aside: Bill Clinton did not say what you say he said, Mr.Potter. The quotation is correct; however, Clinton was not referring to the law but to a particular gap where people couldn’t qualify for subsidies but made too little to afford coverage. .