McCaskill Defends Vote Against Gina Haspel, Says Reasons Are Classified

on April 26, 2018 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 26: Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) questions U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis about a new report detailing procurement violations involving a defense contractor at a hearing held by the Se... WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 26: Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) questions U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis about a new report detailing procurement violations involving a defense contractor at a hearing held by the Senate Armed Services Committee April 26, 2018 in Washington, DC. The committee heard testimony on the Defense Authorization Request for FY2019 and the Future Years Defense Program. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri on Saturday defended her vote against President Donald Trump’s pick for CIA director but said the specific reasons were classified.

McCaskill was one of the few Democrats facing a difficult re-election this fall to oppose the nomination of Gina Haspel, who was confirmed by the Senate on Thursday after a heated debate about her role in the CIA’s torture program.

The Missouri Democrat told reporters at a Kansas City campaign event that her vote was influenced by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who had been tortured as a prisoner of war and also opposed Haspel’s confirmation. But she said the most important reason for her decision came during a classified discussion with Haspel.

“I cross-examined her on the classified material. And I was very uncomfortable with her answers,” McCaskill said. “I wish I could explain to all my constituents the details of all that, but the law will not allow me to do so. I can tell you this, if everyone in Missouri read and listened to her answers to the questions I asked, I believe that a vast majority of Missourians would have voted the same way I did.”

Earlier in the day, Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas seized on McCaskill’s vote during a conference call arranged by the campaign of her Republican opponent, state Attorney General Josh Hawley.

McCaskill “proved once again that she is so liberal and so reflexively opposed to the president that she cannot represent Missouri in the Senate,” Cotton charged. “She put partisan politics over national security.”

McCaskill represents a state that has trended more Republican in recent years. Trump won Missouri by nearly 19 percentage points in 2016.

She sided with the majority of Democrats on Thursday to oppose Haspel’s nomination. A handful of red-state Democrats up for re-election in November voted to confirm her, including West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, Indiana Sen. Joe Donnelly and North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp.

Acknowledging the Republican shift in her state, McCaskill said Missouri voters would need “proof of independence” to support her re-election bid.

She noted that she supported Trump’s pick of Mike Pompeo to serve as secretary of state, adding that she voted with her party only about half the time.

23
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. It’s President Donald Trump’s pick. No more reason is necessary.

  2. Think just because Trump nominated her is not a reason not to confirm her, and McCaskill gave a reason not to vote for confirmation
    If Dems only vote no on his nominations then we are not any better then the Republicans, especially during the Obama years.
    Besides do you really think he picked her? He wouldn’t be able to pick her out of line-up, only comment on her appearance.

  3. It’s laughable that Cotton or any other GOP Congressman can criticize McCaskill for reflexively voting with her party or putting partisan politics above the interests of the country. It’s disappointing that McCaskill “voted with her party only about half the time” but I’ll accept her voting record over any Republican who votes with their party 100% of the time because reasons.

  4. Avatar for docb docb says:

    The reason haspel is another follhardy anti American dotard pic…Shame on the dems who,voted for her…the rethugs are shameless just like the interloper fake news pResident…

    Arrest her…with drumpf and rethugs…

  5. Avatar for theod theod says:

    Willfully destroying evidence that was ordered to be preserved by judges is a criminal act. This part is not “classified” so it is reason enough not to have a lying scofflaw at the top of the CIA.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

17 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajm Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for blandsten Avatar for theod Avatar for krusher Avatar for sandyh Avatar for lastroth Avatar for docb Avatar for potomacker Avatar for shorebreeze Avatar for shirley145 Avatar for crooks Avatar for rickjones Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko

Continue Discussion