Maryland AG Appeals Congressional Redistricting Ruling

Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh speaks during a press conference announcing in Washington, DC, on June 12, 2017. Frosch and Washington, DC, Attorney General Karl Racine announced plans to file a lawsuit against... Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh speaks during a press conference announcing in Washington, DC, on June 12, 2017. Frosch and Washington, DC, Attorney General Karl Racine announced plans to file a lawsuit against US President Donald Trump arguing he is violating anti-corruption clauses in the Constitution by allowing his businesses to accept payments from foreign governments. / AFP PHOTO / JIM WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SILVER SPRING, Md. (AP) — Maryland’s attorney general on Thursday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review an order for state officials to draw up a new congressional redistricting plan that isn’t tainted by partisan gerrymandering.

Attorney General Brian Frosh’s office also filed a separate request for the redistricting case to remain on hold until the Supreme Court acts on the state’s appeal.

A Nov. 7 ruling by a panel of three federal judges orders the state to submit a new map by March 7. Otherwise, the court said it will appoint a commission to produce a redistricting plan for use in the 2020 congressional election.

In a court filing Thursday, Frosh’s office argued the judges’ order should be suspended pending the outcome of the Supreme Court appeal “to avoid potentially contradictory results or needless expenditure of public resources.”

Several Republican voters sued over the boundaries of one of Maryland’s eight congressional districts, claiming state officials unfairly redrew it in 2011 to favor Democrats.

The Supreme Court reviewed the case before deciding in June to refer it back to the lower court for a decision, effectively allowing the 2011 map to remain in place for last week’s midterm elections.

Attorneys from Frosh’s office noted the Supreme Court could address the issue of partisan gerrymandering again during its current term.

“Any further guidance from the Supreme Court will be important to ensure that, even if this Court’s order is affirmed, state lawmakers do not redraw Maryland’s electoral map for 2020 using a standard that is not the one ultimately adopted by the Supreme Court,” they wrote.

The panel hearing the case in U.S. District Court in Maryland said the state must redraw the 6th congressional district’s lines using “traditional criteria for redistricting,” showing regard for “natural boundaries.”

The decision, written by 4th U.S. Circuit Court Judge Paul Niemeyer, says the state’s 2011 congressional map removed roughly 66,000 Republican voters from the 6th district and added around 24,000 Democratic voters, “bringing about the single greatest alteration of voter makeup in any district in the Nation following the 2010 census.”

Redistricting maps are drawn by the governor and approved by the state’s General Assembly, which is currently controlled by Democrats.

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican, said in a statement last week that the judges’ decision confirms that Maryland has “the most gerrymandered districts in the country.”

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: