WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. employers shrugged off last month’s partial government shutdown and engaged in a burst of hiring in January, adding 304,000 jobs, the most in nearly a year.
The healthy gain the government reported Friday illustrated the job market’s durability nearly a decade into the economic expansion. The U.S. has now added jobs for 100 straight months, the longest such period on record.
The government also said the unemployment rate rose to 4 percent from 3.9 percent, but mostly for a technical reason: Roughly 175,000 federal workers were counted as temporarily unemployed because of the shutdown.
Job growth in December was revised sharply lower, to 222,000 from a previously estimated 312,000. Still, hiring has accelerated since last summer, a development that has surprised economists, because hiring typically slows when unemployment is so low.
The solid jobs report provided a note of reassurance that the economy remains mostly healthy and likely to shake off any effects of the shutdown. The shutdown will probably end up slowing the economy’s growth for the first three months of the year. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that it lowered annual growth for the January-March quarter by about 0.4 percentage point, to a rate of 2.1 percent.
Thousands of government workers who missed two paychecks slowed their spending. The federal government itself also spent less. In addition, many businesses across the country lost income. Tourists cut back on visits to national parks, for example, thereby hurting nearby restaurants and hotels.
Yet even employers whose revenue dropped likely held onto their workers during January. With unemployment so low and many companies struggling to fill jobs, layoffs might not have been widespread.
Data from the employment site Glassdoor shows that the number of job postings rose nearly 9 percent in late January compared with a year earlier, suggesting that demand for labor remained strong.
The partial government shutdown has delayed the release of a range of government data about the economy, including statistics on housing, factory orders, and fourth-quarter growth.
The reports that have been released have been mixed. The Federal Reserve’s industrial production report showed that manufacturing output rose in December by the most in nearly a year, boosted by auto production.
But consumer confidence fell in January for a third straight month as Americans’ optimism dimmed amid the shutdown and sharp drops in the stock market. Falling confidence can cause consumers to restrain their spending, though economists note that confidence typically returns quickly after shutdowns end.
The housing market has slumped as mortgage rates have increased. Sales of existing homes plunged in December and fell 3.1 percent in 2018 from the previous year. Mortgage rates have fallen back after nearly touching 5 percent last year, but the number of Americans who signed contracts to buy homes still declined in December.
China’s economy is decelerating sharply and Italy’s economy has entered recession, exacerbating fears that slower global growth will cut into U.S. exports.
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell this week cited the weaker global economy as a key reason why the central bank will be “patient” before it raises its benchmark interest rate again. That was a sharp turnaround from January, when Fed policymakers forecast two additional hikes for this year.
Surprising that the Labor Dept was off by 90,000 jobs for December (reported figures revised downward by 90k). What will the revisions be like for January? People I talk to in the business world, no matter their political persuasion, have a feeling of wariness. I hear the words ‘recession’ thrown around a lot even though things may not be particularly bad at present for their companies.
Does anyone believe these numbers? If its measured by filed unemployment benefits than I can see how it could be way off since a lot of those gov’t workers probably didn’t apply right away if at all. I would surmise they weren’t part of the calculations either or not as they should have been. Most workers never thought they’d go without two paychecks, so holding out was probably what many did instead of filing early or at all. I just find any numbers out of this maladministration bogus or at best inflated. All the good gov’t people that were charged with figuring out these employment numbers were probably also out on furlough. Just call me cynical I guess.
If 175,000 workers were furloughed – unemployed during the month – the actual job gain was 125,000
That’s why the unemployment rate rose.
The Department of Labor is now lying about its numbers, and that is extremely dangerous.
How much of the jump was due to furloughed employees taking a temp job?
Who was collecting the data? Government workers? Were they paid? Lots of economic data was not being collected during the shutdown. Why this?