Jim Jordan Might Move To House Intel As Public Phase Of Impeachment Inquiry Ramps Up

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 4: U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) speaks to reporters following a closed hearing with the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees at the U.S. Capitol on November 4, 2019 in... WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 4: U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) speaks to reporters following a closed hearing with the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees at the U.S. Capitol on November 4, 2019 in Washington, DC. On Monday, House investigators released the first transcripts from closed-door depositions in the impeachment inquiry. Four White House officials scheduled for depositions in the impeachment inquiry on Monday have signaled that they will not show up. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) may take on a new role in the impeachment inquiry as it moves into its public phase.

Top House Republicans are reportedly considering temporarily assigning Jordan, who is currently a ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, to the House Intelligence Committee — the panel assigned to conduct initial public impeachment inquiry hearings. Jordan has led GOP efforts in the closed-door impeachment proceedings thus far.

A senior Republican involved in the process told CBS, who first reported the possible move Monday night, that discussions about Jordan’s possible House Intelligence Committee move are “active and serious.” The Washington Post also reported the news Tuesday morning, citing two GOP aides familiar with the matter. The Post noted that the move would need to be approved by the full House next week when it comes back into session. It is currently unclear which Republican on the committee would be removed. Republican conference rules also dictate that the speaker of the House handles appointments to the Select Committee on Intelligence.

Jordan confirmed his possible House Intel role during an appearance on “Fox & Friends” Tuesday morning.

“We’ll see. That’s a call for [House Minority] Leader McCarthy,” Jordan said, adding that he “just wants to help our team.”

“I want to help the country see the truth here, that President Trump didn’t do anything wrong, and that what the Democrats are doing is partisan, it’s unfair and frankly it’s ridiculous,” Jordan said.

Jordan also doubled down on his demand Monday morning for the whistleblower to publicly testify while throwing House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA) under the bus.

“One way you determine someone’s credibility, what their motivation is, what biases they may have, they need to be under oath, answering your questions and frankly the position we have is the same position Adam Schiff had six weeks ago,” Jordan said. “Remember when this first happened Adam Schiff said we need to hear from the whistleblower. Then, six weeks later, no, no, we don’t.”

However, Jordan did not reiterate his point the day before that the transcripts Schiff would release would be real — an argument that undercuts Trump’s Sunday tweet insisting that Schiff would “change the words.”

When TPM reached out to the House Intelligence Committee Tuesday morning, the panel declined to comment on the possible move.

TPM also reached out to both McCarthy and the House Oversight and Reform Committee on Tuesday and will update this post if we hear back.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who sits on the House Judiciary Committee, advocated for Jordan’s possible House Intel move in a Tuesday morning tweet and added that Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) and Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) should be considered for the panel as well.

Watch Jordan’s remarks below:

Correction: This post originally misstated that Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy had the discretion to choose new members of the Intelligence Committee. Republican conference rules state that the Speaker handles the membership of that committee. We regret the error.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: