House Votes To Recommend Contempt Charges Against Navarro And Scavino

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 18: White House trade adviser Peter Navarro speaks to reporters outside the West Wing at the White House on Thursday, June 18, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Pos... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 18: White House trade adviser Peter Navarro speaks to reporters outside the West Wing at the White House on Thursday, June 18, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The House voted 220-203 to recommend criminal contempt charges against former Trump administration officials Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino for defying subpoenas from the Jan. 6 Select Committee. The resolution’s passage refers contempt charges against Navarro and Scavino to the Justice Department.

Reps. Liz Cheney (R-WY) and Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), both of whom serve on the Jan. 6 Select Committee, were the only Republicans to vote for the contempt resolution.

The vote comes two days after the House Rules Committee voted along party lines to advance the Jan. 6 Select Committee’s contempt referrals of the former Trump White House officials to the full House.

In his remarks during debate on the contempt resolution, Jan. 6 Select Committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) argued that it was “not conceivable” for Navarro and Scavino’s efforts to carry out former President Trump’s Big Lie to have “legally overlapped with their official duties.”

“But beyond that, it was a betrayal of the oath these men took,” Thompson said in floor remarks. “It was a betrayal of the public trust. Even if you do it on your own time, trying to overturn an election is still trying to overturn an election.”

Cheney, who serves as the vice chair of the Jan. 6 Select Committee, stressed in floor remarks prior to the contempt vote that the panel would have preferred Navarro and Scavino’s compliance with their subpoenas. Cheney said the committee was left with no choice but to refer contempt charges against them.

“When you hear my colleagues attack the Select Committee, remember Mr. Scavino and Mr. Navarro have chosen not to appear,” Cheney said. “They did not have to make this choice, but they did.”

House Republicans repeatedly defended the former Trump officials’ executive privilege claims during debate on the resolution.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) used his time on the floor to air a series of GOP grievances, which included complaints about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) rejecting two of Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s (R-CA) picks to serve on what would have been a bipartisan commission investigating the events of Jan. 6. Pelosi at the time said Reps. Jordan and Jim Banks (R-IN) were unfit to serve on the committee for their efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 presidential election as Trump’s loyal foot soldiers.

Additionally, Jordan’s remarks touched on GOP complaints of the so-called “border crisis,” high gas prices, as well as fear-mongering about crime levels in major cities and inflation.

“This committee has more contempt resolutions for a purely political reason,” Jordan said. “I think the whole committee is purely political, designed to do one thing: keep President Trump off the ballot in 2024.”

Navarro and Scavino’s contempt referrals follow other contempt votes for former Trump White House officials Steve Bannon and Mark Meadows that passed the House.

Thus far, Bannon is the sole Trumpworld figure who has been charged with contempt of Congress after defying subpoenas by the Committee. Bannon’s contempt of Congress trial is set for July.

Latest News
72
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. It’s about time. Our current legal system has too many slow-walk opportunities. Justice delayed is justice denied, and we’re not seeing much “justice” for the insurrection organizers yet. A few of the lower level people have been convicted, but Individual One is still at large and in charge.

  2. So the congressional fascist cult remains united in their opposition to accountability for fascist cult members. United in their opposition to our democracy and in their disdain for the rule of law.

    I do not consider Cheney and Kinzinger to be members of the fascist cult, nor does the cult consider them members.

  3. Avatar for caltg caltg says:

    Once upon a time, not too long ago, the GOP touted itself as the law and order party. Now known as the GQP, they clearly have no use for law and order, as repeatedly displayed by their unanimous rejection of due process, bringing criminals to accountability and justice, and playing fast and loose with rules and traditions that they expect others to live up to.

    And all this is most definitely NOT a fairy tale.

  4. Criminal Contempt is mearly a process crime. Not worthy of prosecution. Yea right.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

66 more replies

Participants

Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for zandru Avatar for robb_ludwig Avatar for hccarey Avatar for inversion Avatar for lastroth Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for massie Avatar for iconoclast Avatar for brian512 Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for timorwig Avatar for lanabill Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for rockitttla Avatar for communistagronomist Avatar for Kurtywerty Avatar for IBecameACitizenforthis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: