House Dems Move To Save Obamacare Against Ruling Striking It Down

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (2nd-R), D-CA, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (2nd-L), D-NY, Rep. Steny Hoyer (L), D-MD, and Senator Dick Durbin (R), D-IL, exit the White House after meeting with US president Donald... House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (2nd-R), D-CA, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (2nd-L), D-NY, Rep. Steny Hoyer (L), D-MD, and Senator Dick Durbin (R), D-IL, exit the White House after meeting with US president Donald Trump to discuss the partial government shutdown, January 4, 2019 in Washigton, DC. (Photo by Alex Edelman / AFP) (Photo credit should read ALEX EDELMAN/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — The new Democratic-controlled House has moved toward defending former President Barack Obama’s health care law against a federal court ruling that the statute is unconstitutional, part of the party’s effort to use the issue to embarrass Republicans.

The House has filed papers seeking to intervene in the case, Democrats announced Friday, which by itself is unlikely to have a substantial impact on the litigation. The House action’s greatest impact is likely to be political.

The chamber plans to vote next week to authorize its attorneys to enter the case and defend the law. That is designed to force Republicans to choose between seeming to defend the statute they have long despised or supporting the demise of its widely popular benefits.

“While the administration refuses to meet its responsibilities to defend the laws, the House of Representatives is acting to uphold the constitutionality of this law and protect the health care of every American,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a written statement.

In June, Trump administration lawyers stopped defending key parts of the law, including its guaranteed access to health insurance for people with pre-existing medical conditions.

The Justice Department usually defends federal laws in court, but Trump has long unsuccessfully sought to repeal the health care statute. Congressional Republicans unanimously opposed the 2010 law and have voted repeatedly to repeal it.

The statute has gained public acceptance, particularly its protections for people with pre-existing conditions. To defend themselves during last fall’s campaigns, many Republicans said they’d back legislation ensuring coverage for people with pre-existing medical issues.

A federal judge in Texas said last month that the law was unconstitutional because Congress repealed its fines on uninsured people. The suit has moved to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, and in the meantime the law’s provisions remain in effect.

The House voted Thursday — the first day of the new Congress — to give preliminary approval to its attorneys to enter the case, a provision that was part of a broad package of rules the chamber adopted. Democrats intended the early vote to signal that health care is a high priority.

During that debate, Republicans offered a non-binding measure saying lawmakers should produce legislation protecting consumers with pre-existing conditions. Democrats blocked it.

16
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for spin spin says:

    The ability to hold signalling votes, which force the republican members in marginal districts (think the 7 who just voted to re-open the government) is really powerful. That republicans “voted against defending protections for preexisting conditions, which were struck down by a republican lawsuit” is a powerful message, and great for a 30 second advertisement.

    seven Republicans voted to fund the government (voting against Trump and for Pelosi’s bill). They were: Upton (mi), waldon (or), Hurd (tx), Fitzpatrick (pa), and king, Katko, and Stefinik (ny). All are the type of folks that these “messaging” votes are aimed at.

    Evidently more republicans were going to break from Trump on reopening the government, but Pence called around and got them to take a bullet.

  2. While this may largely be a symbolic move, the Democratic leadership in the House is drawing a line in the sand. Keep it up!

  3. Avatar for spin spin says:

    To be able to run on “we are protecting your health care, republicans are tying to take it away” they need to start now to have the votes to run a campaign on. The right wing nut job O’Conner’s ruling is a gift to the democrats. They hope that its pending before the US supreme Court come 2020.

  4. The House has filed papers seeking to intervene in the case,
     Democrats announced Friday, which by itself is unlikely to have
     a substantial impact on the litigation. The House action’s
       greatest impact is likely to be political.
    

    Fuck you AP …

    Sending in those who would seek to protect the People from
    those who would withdraw support for life saving care is hardly
    just symbolic —

    Why don’t you wait and see what happens in the Court before
    you shit all over it ? ? …

    [ I know … I know … ]

  5. Storming
    Towards
    Fantastic
    Upheaval

    Hey Donnie, Read between the lines…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

10 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for epicurus Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for ottnott Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tpr Avatar for spin Avatar for maximus Avatar for 10c Avatar for thomaspaine Avatar for funkenstein

Continue Discussion