Graham Admits His Idea Of Pre-Senate Trial Dismissal Is ‘Dead For Practical Purposes’

US Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) discusses the impeachment of US President Trump and the FBI's Russia inquiry on Capitol Hill December 18, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Olivier Douliery / AFP) (Ph... US Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) discusses the impeachment of US President Trump and the FBI's Russia inquiry on Capitol Hill December 18, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Olivier Douliery / AFP) (Photo by OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

With just two days left to go before the Senate impeachment trial kicks off, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) isn’t optimistic about his initial plan for a pre-Senate trial dismissal.

During an interview on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, Graham appeared to shoot down his own idea that the GOP-led Senate could immediately vote to dismiss the impeachment case without hearing any arguments due to lack of votes.

“Yeah, that’s dead for practical purposes,” Graham said. “There are a lot of senators who I think will wind up acquitting the President that believe that we need to hear the house’s case, the President’s case, answer to the House’s case and ask questions and then that’s when the witness requests will beSo the idea of dismissing the case early on is not going to happen. We don’t have the votes for that.”

After saying that the Senate will “play it out along the Clinton model,” Wallace pressed Graham on why he had no opposition to witnesses during the 1999 Clinton impeachment trial unlike how he’s now pushing for the trial to began and end as quickly as possible.

Graham responded that “all these witnesses” — which include Secretary of the State Mike Pompeo and White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney — “were available to the House” and argued that the House restricted Trump from exercising his executive privilege.

“The President has said he would claim executive privilege,” Graham said. “Here’s what’s happened: In the House, they did this in 48 days. They never allowed the President to exercise executive privilege and when he suggested he might, they impeached him for obstructing Congress.”

The night before Graham’s interview, Trump’s legal team characterized the impeachment articles as “constitutionally invalid” in its formal response to the Senate summons.

Watch Graham’s remarks below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Any day one of Graham’s ideas dies is a good day, no doubt.

  2. Wall, meet handwriting.

    No, not that wall.

  3. Says Senator who is himself dead for all practical purposes.

  4. They never allowed the President to exercise executive privilege and when he suggested he might, the impeached him for obstructing Congress.

    There’s a slight problem with Graham’s narrative. Trump told Pompeo, Mulvaney, et al., not to appear. If there is no witness then there is no need to assert executive privilege. The obstruction was in withholding witnesses and documents, not in censoring their testimony.

  5. More from Parnasville.


Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

164 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jw1 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for irasdad Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for clearwater Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for lastroth Avatar for gr Avatar for esva Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for pine Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for junebug Avatar for shirley145 Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for carolson Avatar for yellowbeard Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for ANNFFL

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: