GOPers Flee Gay Marriage Fight: ‘You’re Going To Get Clobbered’

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker speaks with the media at a campaign appearance Thursday, June 12, 2014, in Oak Creek, Wis. Walker, who is running for re-election this year and eyeing a bid for president in 2016, said tha... Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker speaks with the media at a campaign appearance Thursday, June 12, 2014, in Oak Creek, Wis. Walker, who is running for re-election this year and eyeing a bid for president in 2016, said that his personal opposition to same-sex marriage doesn't matter because the ban on gay marriage was put into the state constitution by a vote of the people. A federal judge last week struck down the state's ban on same-sex marriages. (AP Photo/Carrie Antlfinger) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — It took just a few words for the Supreme Court to deal with the question of whether gay marriage is legal. For Republicans thinking about running for the White House in 2016, it won’t be that easy.

The court’s decision Monday to reject appeals from five states that sought to prohibit same-sex marriage reignited a debate inside the GOP between pragmatic Republican officials eager to avoid a fight over a divisive social issue and religious conservatives, a vocal minority that vowed to redouble its efforts and punish those unwilling to join them.

“For us, it’s over in Wisconsin,” said Republican Gov. Scott Walker, whose state’s appeal was among those the court declined with a two-word order, “certiorari denied” — meaning the lower court’s ruling stands.

Walker is seeking re-election in November and is expected to run for president in 2016 if he prevails.

“To me, I’d rather be talking in the future now more about our jobs plan and our plan for the future of the state,” Walker said. “I think that’s what matters to the kids. It’s not this issue.”

But for Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, the move by the high court was a rallying cry. The favorite of religious conservatives vowed to introduce a constitutional amendment designed to prevent “the federal government or the courts from attacking or striking down state marriage laws.”

The courts’ decision effectively raises the number of states where same-sex marriage is legal from 19 to 30, meaning as many as 60 percent of Americans now live in states where gay and lesbian people can marry.

A decade ago, President George W. Bush won re-election in part by supporting ballot initiatives in several states seeking a constitutional ban on gay marriage, boosting turnout among motivated conservative voters. Support for legal same-sex marriage has grown swiftly in the years since, and several polls have found that majorities of Americans are in favor of legal recognition for gay marriages.

But for religious conservatives who hold outsized influence in Republican presidential contests in the early voting states of Iowa and South Carolina, the issue resonates.

“If you’re a candidate for president who refuses to oppose homosexual marriage, I don’t see how you get elected,” said Steve Scheffler, a Republican national committeeman from Iowa. “You’re going to get clobbered.”

Ralph Reed, chairman of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, issued a warning for anyone eyeing the 2016 presidential contest: “There will be no avoiding this issue.”

That’s exactly what some Republicans contemplating presidential bids would like to do.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie pleaded ignorance when asked about the court’s decision Monday at a campaign appearance in Connecticut.

“I haven’t had a chance to read it,” said Christie, who drew fire from cultural conservatives last year when he declined to appeal a court ruling legalizing gay marriage in his state. “I don’t give comments based on headlines.”

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence said in a statement he was disappointed by the ruling, adding that while he believes “in the importance of traditional marriage,” he would abide by the rule of law.

“People are free to disagree with court decisions but we are not free to disobey them,” he said.

At an event in Washington, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, whose state has an active case that was not among those considered Monday by the Supreme Court, had a muted reaction.

“I continue to believe in traditional marriage, but the ball’s certainly in the court’s court,” he said.

Among the GOP’s crowded 2016 class, only a handful of potential contenders — Cruz and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, among them — aggressively criticized the court’s decision. Both will need support from religious conservatives to fuel a potential presidential bid.

“It is shocking that many elected officials, attorneys and judges think that a court ruling is the ‘final word,'” Huckabee said. “It most certainly is not.”

Other would-be Republican White House candidates have demonstrated how tricky the politics of gay marriage can be.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio supports marriage between a man and a woman, but has urged tolerance for gay couples. He also spoke out in July about what he called a “growing intolerance” against people who oppose same-sex marriage.

Ohio Sen. Rob Portman announced his support for same-sex marriage in 2013. The senator’s son is gay.

The divide is often on display among Republicans even in the same state.

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson on Monday promised to continue fighting to uphold the state constitution’s ban on gay marriage. Former state GOP chairman Katon Dawson, however, said there would be “bigger fish to fry.”

He cited escalating violence around the world and the nation’s tepid economic recovery. “2016,” he said, “isn’t going to be about gay marriage.”

___

Associated Press writers Bill Barrow in Atlanta, Jill Colvin in Trumbull, Connecticut, Scott Bauer in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, and AP Polling Director Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this report.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
23
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Just how long does it take to understand a “ruling” that involves rejecting an appeal with no comment?

    Is this Christie’s brilliance on display again? If so, I think he stole a page from smart-glasses Perry’s playbook.

  2. So, basically Republicans spend years telling us to fear a Big Terrible Thing that represents an existential threat to the very fabric of our society that will surely result in ruin and collapse of all we hold dear. Then, the Big Terrible Thing happens and all of the things they told us to fear either fail to materialize or else turn out to be wholesome and beneficial. And once that happens, the Republicans just shrug their shoulders, dial the shrieks of terror and rage down to low-level grumbling and move on to the next Big Terrible Thing that represents an existential threat to the very fabric of our society that will surely result in ruin and collapse of all we hold ear.

    But enough about Social Security getting involved in Britain’s war with Nazi Germany The United Nations comic books interracial marriage Medicare the Civil Rights movement The Hippy Problem Ted Kennedy rap music computer games Obamacare The Obummer Deficit gay marriage. Ebola is going to destroy us all!!! We must kill brown people to save ourselves!!! We’re all going to dieeee and the Alinskyite Golfer is fiddling while the flames rise!!! Also, too, ISIS.

    Good thing they don’t make a habit of this kind of thing. Otherwise some Democrat might recognize the pattern and work this into a campaign commercial.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EuAZsz_z_U
  3. Avatar for Drea Drea says:

    “It is shocking that many elected officials, attorneys and judges think
    that a court ruling is the ‘final word,’” Huckabee said. “It most
    certainly is not.”"

    No, for example when you helped Wayne Dumond get out of prison and he went on to murder two women, a court ruling was definitely not the final word. Instead, Mike Huckabee made sure that more death would happen because of his big mouth.

    Someone find Huckabee and tell him to shut the fuck up.

  4. Avatar for johng johng says:

    Please… It’s that 60% of states now can allow marriage =, not that 60% of Americans … indeed, these 60% of states may (and likely do) hold more than 60% of the population, since I know they include most of the big ones like NY and CA and MA.

  5. Avatar for Drea Drea says:

    And that’s when you realize all their concerns are the concerns of worthless fucking assholes who are not worth the trouble to try to make happy.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

17 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for wiscojoe Avatar for jmj76255 Avatar for progress Avatar for hychka Avatar for mantan Avatar for deewus Avatar for billfrompa Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for ottnott Avatar for fitley Avatar for dnl Avatar for cjbinks Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for bckrd1 Avatar for Drea Avatar for johng

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: