Gravely Ill Former Rep. Claims Capitol Docs Missed His Cancer

FILE - In this May 22, 2009 file photo, then-Rep. Steven LaTourette, R-Ohio speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. Former Rep. LaTourette, gravely ill with pancreatic cancer, has filed a claim against the government o... FILE - In this May 22, 2009 file photo, then-Rep. Steven LaTourette, R-Ohio speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. Former Rep. LaTourette, gravely ill with pancreatic cancer, has filed a claim against the government over the treatment he received from his Capitol doctors. He contends they failed to pass along critical information about a lesion on the organ and the need for follow-up monitoring. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Rep. Steve LaTourette, gravely ill with pancreatic cancer, has filed a claim against the government over the treatment he received from his Capitol doctors, claiming they failed to pass along critical information about a lesion on the organ and the need for follow-up monitoring.

LaTourette, R-Ohio, filed administrative claims against the government earlier this month in anticipation of filing a lawsuit later. But papers filed with a federal court in Washington last week say LaTourette “is likely to succumb to rapid physical and cognitive deterioration” and urge that he be allowed to testify now since he may not be able to when any lawsuit is filed.

LaTourette received his medical care from the Capitol physician over his 18-year congressional career. In 2012 he went to the hospital with gastrointestinal pain, which was diagnosed as pancreatitis. An MRI revealed a small lesion on his pancreas and the radiologist told a Capitol physician that follow-up imaging needed to be done in six months, according to LaTourette’s filing with the court.

But LaTourette says he was never told of the MRI’s results or need to get another. LaTourette retired in early 2013. When his pain returned last summer, he saw private doctors and learned the mass had grown significantly and was cancerous.

Under rules for claims against the government, the Navy — which staffs the Capitol’s Office of the Attending Physician — has six months to respond to LaTourette’s claims, which were filed earlier this month. If the claims are denied, LaTourette and his wife Jennifer can file a lawsuit.

LaTourette was first elected in the GOP wave of 1994 but was generally regarded as a moderate. He was a supporter of infrastructure spending, Amtrak and congressional set-asides known as earmarks. When he announced his retirement, LaTourette said he was sick of the partisanship that had taken over Congress.

Pancreatic cancer is especially deadly. LaTourette’s court papers say his “prognosis is uncertain but grave, with no definitive predictions regard to life expectancy.”

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

33
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Sucks to be Steve, but this is just another example of frivolous lawsuits and why we need tort reform. The fact is that now that we know this doctor misses early signs of cancer, the free market will quickly decide that he’s not a good value (unless he lowers his fees), which will then produce better, smarter doctors for everyone, without the jackboot of the federal government on our necks, shoving “malpractice” laws down our throats.

    Who is John Galt?

  2. "But LaTourette says he was never told of the MRI’s results or need to get another. "

    That’s a lack of the patient being proactive in his own care. I would’ve DEMANDED an explanation of the results of the MRI and needed follow up and not left the doctor’s office w/o same. It’s the Rep.s own fault I think. And I am saying this as a cancer survivor myself. Not pancreatic cancer but cancer just the same.

  3. “LaTourette says he was never told of the MRI’s results or need to get another.”

    This is unfortunate. But if I have an MRI performed on me “never told the results” won’t apply to my attention to the test’s results. Knowing the test was performed why didn’t he insist on a full consultation reviewing what was found and what, if anything, needed done about it?

  4. That’s textbook medical malpractice, y’all.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

27 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for fess Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for harry_truman Avatar for marby Avatar for mymy Avatar for thunderhawk Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for tomj Avatar for water Avatar for darrtown Avatar for upstateny13027 Avatar for beattycat Avatar for unabogie Avatar for lcelsie Avatar for johniwaniszek Avatar for bacon_family

Continue Discussion