Federal Workers’ Union Sues Over Forced Work Without Pay During Shutdown

on January 10, 2019 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 10: People rally against the partial federal government shutdown outside the U.S. Capitol January 10, 2019 in Washington, DC. A stalemate continues between President Trump and congressional... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 10: People rally against the partial federal government shutdown outside the U.S. Capitol January 10, 2019 in Washington, DC. A stalemate continues between President Trump and congressional Democrats as they cannot come to a bipartisan solution for more money to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) MORE LESS

A union representing 150,000 government employees — including workers at the IRS, Customs and Border Protection, EPA, FDA and other agencies — sued the government Wednesday, saying the Trump administration had too broadly interpreted a law that requires certain federal employees to work without pay during shutdowns.

“If employees are working, they must be paid—and if there is not money to pay them, then they should not be working,” Tony Reardon, the national president of the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), said in a press release accompanying the suit.

Thousands of employees across several agencies have been working without pay as the partial government shutdown drags on.

The law in question, the Antideficiency Act, says the government may require employees to work during shutdowns in “emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property.” It was later amended to clarify that “the term ‘emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property’ does not include ongoing, regular functions of government the suspension of which would not imminently threaten the safety of human life or the protection of property.”

That latter category of work, the NTEU said in a complaint filed Wednesday, is exactly what the Trump administration — and specifically acting chief of staff and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney, who approved agencies’ shutdown contingency plans — has allowed to take place.

“Many of the employees designated as excepted, in accordance with the OMB directive, including many members of Plaintiff NTEU, are persons whose services involve only ‘the ongoing, regular functions of government, the suspension of which would not imminently threaten the safety of human life or the protection of property,’” the complaint reads in part. “Their excepted status is thus inconsistent with the plain text of the Antideficiency Act.”

As an example, the union said the administration will likely force some IRS workers to help process Americans’ tax refunds.

“These employees would not be paid for the work that they perform during the lapse in appropriations,” the complaint reads.

The union asked the court to declare the Antideficiency Act unconstitutional, for bypassing Congress’ power of the purse, or, alternatively, to declare the Trump administration in violation of the plain text of the law because of its over-broad interpretation of who is considered an excepted employee.

The suit followed a separate legal effort from members of the union alleging that the administration has violated the Fair Labor Standards Act during the shutdown. The union held rallies across the country Thursday to highlight the impact of federal workers losing pay during the shutdown.

Read the suit below:

45
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for caltg caltg says:

    Gee, yet one more time the Trump mal-administration is being taken to court. Trump is well on his way to setting an all time record for the number of times any US president has been sued.

  2. Perfect
    Fight the Orange menace in an arena where he always loses
    The right injunction will really shut shit down
    Congress will be stuck in Washington when the airlines shut down
    You want to see a veto proof bill?

  3. Shit getting real
    AMIRITE Donnie?

  4. I think he’s blown through that ceiling already ……

    ’ on his way to ’ …… however …….

    would be an interesting destination debate —

    I’ve already placed my bet ----

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

39 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for epicurus Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for thebishop Avatar for bboerner Avatar for mrf Avatar for tena Avatar for caltg Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for birdford Avatar for tiowally Avatar for brian512 Avatar for socalista Avatar for eisenst Avatar for godless Avatar for phlogiston Avatar for zillacop Avatar for outis Avatar for occamscoin

Continue Discussion