Fed Chief ‘Puzzled’ That Despite Good Economy, Few Workers Getting Raises

Federal Reserve board member Jerome Powell stands as President Donald Trump announces him as his nominee for the next chair of the Federal Reserve in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
FILE - In this Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017, file photo, Federal Reserve board member Jerome Powell stands as President Donald Trump announces him as his nominee for the next chair of the Federal Reserve in the Rose Garden... FILE - In this Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017, file photo, Federal Reserve board member Jerome Powell stands as President Donald Trump announces him as his nominee for the next chair of the Federal Reserve in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. The Senate Banking Committee has scheduled Powell's confirmation hearing for Nov. 28. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — Halfway through a news conference Wednesday, the head of the world’s most powerful central bank was asked a question weighing on the minds — and the checking accounts — of Americans everywhere:

When will people finally start getting meaningful pay raises?

Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, had no satisfactory answer.

He called it a “puzzle.” And then, as if measuring his words, he said he wasn’t prepared to call it a “mystery.”

Puzzle or mystery, the source of the consternation is this: The U.S. unemployment rate has dropped to a multi-decade low of 3.8 percent. A shortage of qualified people to hire has frustrated many employers who have complained that they can’t fill job openings.

In theory, those two factors should combine to unleash a wave of robust pay raises for everyone from construction crews, teachers, accountants and hotel clerks to engineers, janitors, butchers, baristas and even summer interns.

It hasn’t happened — not in most industries, anyway.

Powell acknowledged that he couldn’t say for sure why wage growth remains generally tepid. He said he “certainly would have expected pay raises to react more” to falling unemployment.

Echoing what other economists, including his predecessors and colleagues at the Fed, have suggested, Powell offered up one likely factor: the economy’s relatively low productivity growth. Put simply, American workers aren’t generating enough additional value for each hour on the job.

Some economists say companies have invested too little in capital equipment that would accelerate worker productivity. Others say earlier technological breakthroughs that did speed productivity have yet to be duplicated. But no one is sure.

“So it’s a bit of a puzzle,” the chairman mused, somewhat philosophically. “I wouldn’t say it’s a mystery. But it’s, it’s a bit of a puzzle.”

Powell didn’t explain his distinction between puzzle and mystery. But he has used similar formulations before. In 2017, as a Fed governor, Powell told CNBC that the persistence of inflation remaining below the central bank’s 2 percent target after years of monetary stimulus was “kind of a mystery.”

Yet in recent months, inflation seems to have picked up, driven by higher oil prices.

Fed officials estimated Wednesday that inflation would run slightly above its target through 2020. That forecast appeared to suggest that low unemployment and a gaping federal budget deficit in the wake of President Donald Trump’s tax cuts would finally keep inflation at or above the Fed’s annual 2 percent target rate.

This newfound inflation is actually something of a challenge for many workers. After factoring in inflation, average hourly earnings have been flat for the past year, the Labor Department said this week. For workers who aren’t supervisors, wages have actually fallen slightly despite the rush of hiring in an economic expansion on the verge of completing its ninth year.

What economists call the “Phillips curve” — which says low unemployment should accelerate pay growth — appears to be broken or twisted. Or at least operating on a severe delay.

Other economists have suggested answers that go beyond the Fed’s mandate of using interest rates, asset purchases and public communication to stabilize prices and maximize employment. The liberal Economic Policy Institute released a study in 2016 showing that the long-standing decline in union membership had come at the expense of worker pay raises.

Other economists note that Americans have found themselves increasingly in competition with foreigner workers who earn less and that this factor has suppressed wages in some industries.

Separate research has that found higher wages are now concentrated at exceptionally profitable tech darlings like Facebook, where federal filings show median pay topped $240,000 last year. Workers at many less profitable firms are being left behind.

Then there’s the issue of some workers being forced to sign non-compete agreements.

And there’s the rise of what economists call a “monopsony.” That tongue-tripping term refers to industries or communities with just a few very large employers. Research has found that employers in such cases can limit pay growth because workers have few options to quit for similar jobs at rival employers.

On Wednesday, Powell ended his new conference with an answer to a question about whether most workers will see significant raises, given the money that major companies are pouring into stock buybacks rather than into pay.

The Fed chairman stressed that he still thought a strong job market would propel faster pay growth in time. Yet, he added, referring to companies that reward investors above workers, “we don’t really have the tools that will address the distribution of profits and that kind of thing.”

With those words, Powell left the lectern.

Latest News
83
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “we don’t really have the tools that will address the distribution of profits and that kind of thing.”

    Well we used to. They were called unions I think.

  2. No! The problem is at the top.

    It’s Trickle Down, and 1% of the workforce is getting hefty wages. Consider that. Consider the infrastructure is falling apart, making it harder to perform. Consider that. Consider the profitability of crime, and that we’re under assault every minute on every device we own.

    No, there’s nothing wrong with workers. We’re not to blame for our poverty.

  3.                         ‘Puzzled’
    

    Whew ! …

    Thank doG that some people can’t put a round peg in a round hole –

    Now I’ve got to get a bigger boat …
    My little 300 ft. jalopy just isn’t cutting it ! —

  4. “So it’s a bit of a puzzle,” the chairman mused, somewhat philosophically. “I wouldn’t say it’s a mystery. But it’s, it’s a bit of a puzzle.”

    Yeah, it’s a puzzlement alright.

  5. Obviously another moron who does not understand the plan. Funnel all the money to the CEO, who will then contribute to the Republican party, which will then pull the wool over the eyes of the rubes. At this point I am not hopeful that those who continually vote against their own interests will ever wake up. They have been bamboozled and will stay that way thanks to the confluence of marketing science and the internet.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

77 more replies

Participants

Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for jep07 Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for adabsurdum Avatar for cervantes Avatar for theod Avatar for vonq Avatar for sandyh Avatar for sniffit Avatar for arrendis Avatar for eliza614 Avatar for denisj Avatar for zrx1100 Avatar for esva Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for greysea Avatar for 10c Avatar for loss_mentality Avatar for greenman66

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: