INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — A federal judge has blocked an Indiana mandate forcing women to undergo an ultrasound at least 18 hours before having an abortion, ruling that the requirement is likely unconstitutional and creates “clearly undue” burdens on women, particularly low-income women.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt’s ruling, issued late Friday, grants a preliminary injunction temporarily blocking the ultrasound waiting period. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky and the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana had sued the state last July, contending the mandate was unconstitutional and would prevent some women from getting abortions.
Pratt’s ruling said the waiting period “creates significant financial and other burdens” on Planned Parenthood and its patients, particularly low-income women who face lengthy travel to one of only six Planned Parenthood health centers that can offer an informed-consent ultrasound appointment.
The judge, who heard arguments in the case in November, found that Indiana had presented “no compelling evidence” to support its contention that the mandate would further its stated interest of convincing women not to have an abortion.
“Simply put, the State has not provided any convincing evidence that requiring an ultrasound to occur eighteen hours prior to an abortion rather than on the day of an abortion makes it any more likely that a woman will choose not to have an abortion,” Pratt wrote. She added that the mandate “likely creates an undue burden on women’s constitutional rights.”
A study of 15,000 women served by Planned Parenthood in Los Angeles is cited in Pratt’s ruling. It found that 99 percent women proceeded with an abortion after not viewing the ultrasound, compared with 98.4 percent who did view the ultrasound.
The requirement that women undergo ultrasounds at least 18 hours before having an abortion had replaced a previous Indiana provision that required women to get an ultrasound before having an abortion but did not specify when that had to occur.
Planned Parenthood said in its lawsuit that under the state’s earlier measure the group performed ultrasounds on women immediately prior to their abortions.
Betty Cockrum, the CEO and president of Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, praised Pratt’s decision, calling it “an incredibly strong ruling” that protects Indiana women’s right to an abortion from needless burdens.
“I would prefer that the Legislature figure out that it’s not their job to practice medicine, and that we would in fact get politicians out of our doctor’s offices,” she said.
The ultrasound mandate is part of a wide-ranging abortion restrictions law that took effect July 1, 2016, a day after Pratt blocked the law’s provision that would have banned abortions sought because of a fetus’ genetic abnormalities, such as Down syndrome. The judge also blocked a provision requiring that aborted fetuses be buried or cremated.
Then-Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, who is now vice president, signed the legislation into law in March 2016.
Ken Falk, the legal director of the ACLU of Indiana, said only about 25 percent of Indiana women seeking abortions actually agree to see the fetal ultrasound, or hear the fetal heartbeat if it’s present. The remainder signed a form saying they have declined to see that information, he said.
Falk said Indiana has 30 days to appeal the ruling.
Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill’s office had not released a statement on Pratt’s decision by late Monday afternoon.
Mike Fichter, the CEO and President of the anti-abortion group Indiana Right to life, urged Hill to appeal Pratt’s ruling and to continue to “fight for Indiana’s constitutional right to put a time requirement on our state’s ultrasound law.”
Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
A woman judge blocking a draconian law that only effects women? Sounds like activist judicial bias to me.
… and the winning streak continues!
More winning, please!
the idea that the ‘state’ has any compelling reason to try to convince a woman to not have a medical procedure is ludicrous on it’s face…
Glad to read. I think this the second or third part of that law that has been turned back by the courts. This is Pence’s view of the role of Government.
While I think he is a bit less unhinged and a little more aware that a reality exists beyond his bubble and sometimes has had to navigate and dwell in the larger universe outside the bubble, this hideous legislation that he signed included a provision that required women to have proof of burial and or cremation of any miscarried or aborted fetus. Hideous in intent and insane as a piece of legislation in terms of how would that be enforced?
Just a reminder as we wish for the down fall of Trump of what lies right behind him in Pence.
Now that’s a fight worth dying for.