Justice Department Wants The Appeal Of Travel Ban Put On Hold

In this Feb. 19, 2017, file photo, people carry posters during a rally against President Donald Trump's executive order banning travel from seven Muslim-majority nations, in New York's Times Square. Trump’s travel ... In this Feb. 19, 2017, file photo, people carry posters during a rally against President Donald Trump's executive order banning travel from seven Muslim-majority nations, in New York's Times Square. Trump’s travel ban has been frozen by the courts, but the White House has promised a new executive order that officials say will address concerns raised by judges that have put the policy on hold. The first order was met by legal challenges, confusion at airports worldwide and mass protests, but the White House has forecast smoother sailing the second time around. (AP Photo/Andres Kudacki) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SEATTLE (AP) — The Justice Department wants a federal appeals court to put President Trump’s travel ban case on hold until he issues a new order.

A government motion filed Friday says all actions on the appeal should be stopped because Trump intends to issue a new executive order that addresses some of the constitutional concerns raised by his first action.

His executive order temporarily banned travelers from seven predominantly Muslim countries and paused the U.S. refugee program.

Washington state and Minnesota sued to stop the order, and a federal judge put it on hold.

The government appealed to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The court set a schedule that requires the government to file an opening brief by March 3. The Justice Department wants that plan set aside for now.

Messages left with the Washington attorney general’s office were not immediately returned.

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
25
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Trump: Unfriendly Press is my Enemy #1. I am winning.

  2. LA Times as well, apparently. Don’t know what the others than AP from those list have decided.

  3. Avatar for j.dave j.dave says:

    Plenty of good seats available for the correspondents’ dinner …

  4. When you listen to the statements coming out of the WH, it’s pretty clear this promised new order is now about 2 weeks overdue. First, they suggested to reporters a new order would be coming within days of the Ninth Circuit ruling, then ‘next week’ which was last week.

    Here we are on Friday without this magical new order and they are worried about a deadline next Friday.

    They already knew outright discrimination based upon religion wouldn’t work so they thought they were being cute. Now, they have learned that Congress many years ago expressly banned discrimination based upon national origin.

    Being a bigot in 2017 is so hard. My guess is we’ll never see this order and they’ll move to Congress and try to amend the Immigration and Naturalization Act. That will take months at least and likely will never happen.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

19 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for losamigos Avatar for afisher Avatar for whit Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for tena Avatar for edhedh Avatar for caltg Avatar for j.dave Avatar for jakebarnes Avatar for saygoodnightgracie

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: