Dems Who Want Assurances Trump Will Respect Fed Funding And GOP Hardliners Oppose ‘Clean’ CR

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 25: U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) delivers remarks after the House passed the Republican's budget resolution on the spending bill on February 25, 2025 at the U.S. Capitol in ... WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 25: U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) delivers remarks after the House passed the Republican's budget resolution on the spending bill on February 25, 2025 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. The resolution, which faced push back for cuts to Medicaid, passed 217-215 and includes President Trump’s tax cuts and increased funding for border security and defense. (Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) made the rounds on major news networks on Sunday, saying he wants to pass a “clean” continuing resolution to fund the government through September — the end of the fiscal year.

As he pushed for the new plan — dropping all talk of a bipartisan funding agreement and pushing forward with a stopgap bill that would fund the government at current levels — Johnson tried to blame Democrats for GOP leaderships’ own change of heart.

“Why?” Johnson asked rhetorically after pushing for the “clean CR” option on Fox News. “Because the Democrats in Congress were trying to demand that as a condition of appropriations, that we would somehow tie the hands of the President, limit his authority, put Elon Musk in a corner and take him off his mission. We’re not doing that. That’s a non-starter, and Democrats know that, so I hope they’ll be reasonable.”

Johnson is referring to a request congressional Democrats involved in the funding negotiation process have made in response to the Trump administration and DOGE taking a sledgehammer to federal funds that have already been allocated by Congress. 

Democrats say in order for them to support passing legislation — either a CR or a bipartisan spending bill — to keep the government funded past the March 14 deadline, they’d need some sort of guarantee that Trump and Musk will stop rescinding and withholding congressionally approved funding and spend federal funds the way they were appropriated.

“Let’s be clear, the Democrat demand is really simple,” Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) told TPM last week, with a mocking emphasis on the word “demand.” “It’s that the President commits to following the law. That’s it. It’s not a big deal … The guardrails that we are asking for are really minimal. It’s just: spend the money as we all appropriated,”

In response to Johnson’s “clean” CR plans, as well as the finger pointing and refusal to consider Democrats’ request — that the President follow the law — House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) accused Republicans of walking away from government funding talks ahead of the looming shutdown deadline.

“The top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, Rosa De Lauro, remains ready, willing and able to talk with our Republican colleagues, but there has been zero outreach from the Trump administration and House Republicans have walked away from the negotiating table,” Jeffries said in a Sunday afternoon statement.

Reacting to Johnsons’ “clean CR” push, Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) also made it clear he won’t be onboard.

“I will not vote for a clean CR. I will not vote for the status quo,” Moskowitz said in a X post on Sunday.

The reality is Republican leadership will almost certainly need Democrats to pass a clean stopgap to fund the government through September and avoid a shutdown.

Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-OH), who voted against the last CR Johnson worked out with President Joe Biden and Democrats, said he’d be a “no” on funding the government at current levels.

“I am a NO on the CR,” Gonzales said in an X statement. “Congress needs to do its job and pass a conservative budget! CR’s are code for Continued Rubberstamp of fraud, waste, and abuse.

It is likely more GOP hardliners, notoriously allergic to short term spending bills, will join Gonzales, dooming Johnson’s “clean” CR vision without the support of Democrats.

Latest News
87
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “We’re in the minority and we have no interest in supporting the majority parties interest in furthering the damage to our Constitution.

    “They have the votes in their party to pass the budget. Let them.”

  2. The Republican Party: A Confederacy of Lickspittles!

  3. Avatar for noonm noonm says:

    “Let’s be clear, the Democrat demand is really simple,” Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) told TPM last week, with a mocking emphasis on the word “demand.” “It’s that the President commits to following the law. That’s it. It’s not a big deal … The guardrails that we are asking for are really minimal. It’s just: spend the money as we all appropriated,”

    It’s simpler than that - there is no point passing any budget if the President refuses to follow it.

    Dems are right to wash their hands of the whole charade.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

81 more replies

Participants

Avatar for fgs Avatar for zandru Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for DuckmanGR Avatar for lastroth Avatar for rmwarnick Avatar for darcy Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for dave_mb Avatar for darrtown Avatar for jinnj Avatar for GhouledKS Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for micande Avatar for justruss Avatar for bcgister Avatar for jackofalltirades Avatar for thomaspaine Avatar for Scoutmom Avatar for Fire_Joni_Ernst Avatar for Vickie48 Avatar for marciaann Avatar for Vic_Bold_II

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: