AR Upholds Voter ID Law Nearly Identical To Restriction Struck Down In 2014

(THOMAS/AFP/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Arkansas’ highest court on Thursday upheld a voter ID law that is nearly identical to a restriction struck down by the court four years ago.

The Arkansas Supreme Court reversed a judge’s ruling against the law approved last year by the Republican-controlled Legislature and governor. A judge had blocked officials from enforcing the restriction, but justices in May stayed that ruling and kept the law in effect while they considered the case.

The high court in 2014 struck down a previous version of the voter ID law as unconstitutional.

The revised voter ID law, which was approved last year, requires voters to show photo identification before casting a ballot. Unlike the previous measure, the new law allows voters to cast provisional ballots if they sign a sworn statement confirming their identities. Opponents of the new measure had argued that it circumvented the 2014 ruling.

In the 5-2 ruling Thursday, justices said lawmakers had the power to enact the restriction by labeling it a change to a constitutional amendment related to voter registration requirements. “It is therefore constitutional,” Justice Robin Wynne wrote in the court’s ruling.

Arkansas officials argued the new law complies with part of the Supreme Court’s ruling striking down the 2013 measure. Justices in 2014 unanimously struck down the previous voter ID law, with a majority of the court ruling that it unconstitutionally added a qualification to vote. Three justices, however, ruled the measure didn’t get the two-thirds vote needed to change voter registration requirements. A majority of the court has changed hands since that ruling, and more than two-thirds of the Arkansas House and Senate approved the new measure last year.

A justice who disagreed with the ruling Thursday questioned the court’s argument that the law was related to voter registration, noting that the state doesn’t require photo ID in order to register to vote.

“If providing photo identification were required at registration, requiring presentation of the card at the polling place would be more defensible,” Justice Jo Hart wrote. “Asking for a photo identification card at the polling place strikes me as locking the barn door after the horse has been stolen.”

Latest News
12
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Outright revolt is the only option left. Wait too long and they’ll completely control the military that they will use against you after having purge the gov’t and military of people they consider enemies of the state.

  2. Gee, if only the Russians had been involved, then the Democratic Party would be losing its mind over this. Instead? Crickets…

  3. I was hoping the article would mention if the composition of the court had changed since 2014.

  4. So the takeaway is Republican traitors sit on the AR Supreme Court. Got it.

  5. Clearly, the justices are more scared of black folk and Hispanic voters than they were four years ago.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

6 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for zedindylil Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for keninmn Avatar for stevenbelsky Avatar for birdford Avatar for asturcot Avatar for carolson Avatar for thisisourcountry

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: