Apple Cooperates With Gov’t Inquiries Into Secret Slowdowns Of Older iPhones

New models of the iPhone 6s are seen displayed during an Apple media event in San Francisco, California on September 9, 2015. Apple unveiled its iPad Pro, saying the large-screen tablet has the power and capabilities... New models of the iPhone 6s are seen displayed during an Apple media event in San Francisco, California on September 9, 2015. Apple unveiled its iPad Pro, saying the large-screen tablet has the power and capabilities to replace a laptop computer. AFP PHOTO/JOSH EDELSON (Photo credit should read Josh Edelson/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Apple is cooperating with U.S. government inquiries into its secret slowdown of older iPhones, further complicating its efforts to move past an issue that irked customers whose devices bogged down.

The company acknowledged the probes late Tuesday after both The Wall Street Journaland Bloomberg reported the U.S. Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission were investigating how investors have been affected by Apple’s handling of the situation.

A software update released in 2016 began to slow down older iPhones when their batteries weakened to prevent them from abruptly turning off. But Apple didn’t fully disclose what it was doing until December 2017.

Apple has since apologized for not being more forthcoming and is replacing batteries on older iPhones for $29, a $50 discount.

The Cupertino, California, company is also working on another software update that will give consumers the option of turning off the slowdown feature, if they are willing to risk a sudden shutdown. That free update, due out this spring, also will include a feature measuring the battery’s strength.

In its latest statement, Apple reiterated its belief that it was acting in the best interest of its customers by extending the lives of their iPhones. Many consumers, however, remain convinced that the company torpedoed the older iPhones to prod them to upgrade to the latest — and more expensive — models released in last fall.

“We have never — and would never — do anything to intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades,” Apple said. “Our goal has always been to create products that our customers love.”

Despite its contrition, Apple is still grappling with the fallout from its slowdown of older iPhones.

Authorities in France are in the midst of an investigation whether Apple violated laws protecting consumers in that country and lawyers in the U.S. are pursuing a variety of class-action lawsuits on behalf of millions of consumers.

Meanwhile, the head of the commerce committee in the U.S. Senate had previously sent a letter to Apple demanding more information about the iPhone slowdown. Apple was supposed to respond by Jan. 23, but was granted an extension and is now expected to answer by the end of this week, said Frederick Hill, a spokesman for Sen. John Thune, a South Dakota Republican who confronted the company.

Both the Justice Department and the SEC have declined to comment on their investigations, leaving it unclear what piqued their interest.

Apple’s delayed disclosure of the iPhone slowdown doesn’t appear to have done significant harm to investors so far.

Just a few weeks after Apple disclosed it had been slowing down older iPhones, the company’s stock surged to an all-time high, despite consumer outrage. The shares have retreated in the past week, but that downturn has been driven by concerns about lackluster demand for its high-priced iPhone X.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for ryokyo ryokyo says:

    Is it too soon to have a genuine discussion of Apple being Broken up?
    I know that nothing would ever come of it until after the election.
    The question in my mind continues to be how much more CONSUMERS will take from an Arrogant “Joe Cool” of a Corporation whose basic attitude has always been and continues to be “You’ll take what we give you, and You’ll gladly pay what we tell you for the Privilege.”
    If any other business tried a scam like this, they would be up to their nostrils in lawsuits before the week was out.
    The cretinous excuse offered is that consumers who carry these devices are somehow not capable of tracking their own battery power consumption is nonsensical on its face. All Apple wants is to push $1000 phones on people, with $150 Earbuds attached. Never forget for a moment that it’s all about the bottom line-MONEY.
    As long as CONSUMERS are willing to bend over, why should Apple care where and how they make money, or from which orrifice their profit from Consumers is “extracted?”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ryokyo

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: