Trump-Appointed Prosecutor Did CBS Interview On Capitol Riot Without Authorization

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 21: Acting US Attorney for Washington, DC, Michael Sherwin speaks at a news conference to provide an update on the investigation of the terrorist bombing of Pan Am flight 103 on the 32nd ann... WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 21: Acting US Attorney for Washington, DC, Michael Sherwin speaks at a news conference to provide an update on the investigation of the terrorist bombing of Pan Am flight 103 on the 32nd anniversary of the attack, at the Department of Justice December 21, 2020 in Washington, DC. Attorney General Bill Barr announced criminal charges against one of the alleged Libyan bombmakers. The bombing occurred on December 21, 1988, killing all 259 people on board and eleven on the ground in Lockerbie, Scotland. (Photo by Michael Reynolds-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A former Trump-appointed top prosecutor supervising Capitol riot cases angered top Justice Department officials when he agreed to sit for a “60 Minutes” interview that the agency had not authorized, Business Insider reported late Monday. 

The public comments about the investigation could jeopardize the investigation and taint the jury pool for cases that won’t likely come to trial for months. 

CNN previously reported that Michael Sherwin, a former interim U.S. attorney of Washington, appeared for the interview without prior authorization from top Justice Department officials. 

Additional reporting from Insider on Monday indicated that Sherwin had also been approached in January, during the final weeks of the Trump administration, about being interviewed for a segment on the agency’s probe into the insurrection before sitting for the interview which was taped on Wednesday and aired Sunday.

A person familiar with the Justice Department’s  deliberations told Insider that after Sherwin was contacted about the CBS interview, he had consulted with Justice Department leaders working under then-Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, who opted against giving him permission to take part. 

During the interview, which aired days after he stepped down from supervising the investigation, Sherwin had reiterated comments he made in January for the potential of bringing charges of seditious conspiracy against some members of the mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6.

“I personally believe the evidence is trending toward that, and probably meets those elements,” Sherwin said.

“I believe the facts do support those charges. And I think that, as we go forward, more facts will support that,” he added.

Sherwin stepped down March 3, allowing the Biden administration to rename Channing Phillips as acting U.S. attorney while a permanent nominee is selected.

Sherwin also told “60 Minutes” that he had watched some of the events Jan. 6 unfold and had witnessed some people with helmets and tactical gear leave early while he accompanied D.C. police to then President Donald Trump’s rally.

In unaired portions of the interview, Sherwin also debunked claims about left-wing professional provocateurs  posing as Trump supporters, “60 Minutes” reported.

Sherwin’s remarks have since sparked questions about whether he violated protocol prohibiting public comments about pending cases. Attorney General Merrick Garland vowed last month as he began his tenure, that he will direct particular focus on the Capitol insurrection.

Garland inherited a Justice Department that was often politicized and frequently succumbed to political pressure during the Trump administration. Garland has vowed to prioritize combating extremist violence as attorney general, while staying free from the fray of political considerations.

“I have grown pretty immune to any kind of pressure, other than the pressure to do what I think is the right thing, given the facts and the law. That is what I intend to do as the attorney general,” Garland said during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing last month. “I don’t care who pressures me in whatever direction.”

Latest News
68
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. DoJ Attention Whore Seeks More …

  2. I guess that means her filings were all frivolous and the courts in which she raised these claims would be acting appropriately if they took action against her, including referral to the appropriate state bar association to get her license pulled.

  3. Does this

    The public comments about the investigation risk jeopardizing the investigation and could taint the jury pool for cases that won’t likely come to trial for months.

    plus

    after Sherwin was contacted about the CBS interview, he had consulted with Justice Department leaders working under then-Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, who opted against giving him permission to take part

    add up to (intentional) sabotage of the coming sedition and other cases??

    I put absolutely nothing beyond the skullduggery and malfeasance of Trumpies…

  4. Avatar for danny danny says:

    Was she called out on this tactic at the time she was doing it? It was also Giuliani’s specialty, it seems to me.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

62 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jnbenson Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for 1gg Avatar for cervantes Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for go2goal Avatar for darcy Avatar for nemo Avatar for greylady Avatar for grandpajoe Avatar for edgarant Avatar for 1american Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for formerchild Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for nycabj Avatar for redhand Avatar for davidn Avatar for bcgister Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for kovie Avatar for laparque Avatar for old_guru

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: