3 Female Justices Dissent In First Post-Hobby Lobby Contraception Case

** FOR USE AS DESIRED, YEAR END PHOTOS ** FILE -In this Oct. 1, 2010 file photo provided by the Supreme Court shows, from left, Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Justice Elena Kagan in the Justices... ** FOR USE AS DESIRED, YEAR END PHOTOS ** FILE -In this Oct. 1, 2010 file photo provided by the Supreme Court shows, from left, Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Justice Elena Kagan in the Justices' Conference Room prior to Justice Kagan's Investiture Ceremony at the court in Washington. (AP Photo/Steve Petteway, Supreme Court, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Thursday allowed, at least for now, an evangelical college in Illinois that objects to paying for contraceptives in its health plan to avoid filling out a government document that the college says would violate its religious beliefs.

The justices said that Wheaton College does not have to fill out the contested form while its case is on appeal but can instead write the Department of Health and Human Services declaring that it is a religious nonprofit organization and making its objection to emergency contraception. The college does provide coverage for other birth control.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor said they would have denied Wheaton’s request and made the college fill out a form that enables their insurers or third-party administrators to take on the responsibility of paying for the birth control.

The order follows the high court’s decision on Monday giving Hobby Lobby Inc. and other businesses with religious objections the ability to opt out of paying for birth control for women covered by their employee health plans.

The Obama administration had already offered a way out of paying for the contraceptives to faith-affiliated charities, colleges and hospitals. They must fill out the document known as Form 700 that enables their insurers or third-party administrators to take on the responsibility of paying for the birth control. The employer does not have to arrange the coverage or pay for it. Insurers get reimbursed by the government through credits against fees owed under other provisions of the health care law.

Wheaton and dozens of other nonprofits have sued over the form, which they say violates their religious beliefs because it forces them to participate in a system to subsidize and distribute the contraception.

The court said it was not ultimately deciding the issue Thursday and noted that it is likely to take up the nonprofits’ cases at some point.

For now, though, it said in an unsigned opinion that the letter to HHS is sufficient and that the government can rely on the letter to ensure that women covered by Wheaton’s insurance can obtain emergency contraception at no cost.

In a 16-page dissent, Sotomayor said the procedure outlined by the court is clumsy and unnecessary. “I disagree strongly with what the court has done,” she said, joined by Ginsburg and Kagan.

Houses of worship and other religious institutions whose primary purpose is to spread the faith are exempt from the requirement to offer birth control.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Wheaton College v. HHS

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. So the form to opt out of the system forces Wheaton to participate in the system? That assertion should have been laughed out of court on day one.

  2. My freedom of religion trumps your “right” to make me fill out forms and other fascist activities and stuff.

  3. Plus, I think some of my molecules are touching other molecules that touch other molecules that form a chain of molecules that touch the form, so you can’t even have the form exist, because Jesus.

  4. Yeah but somehow suing over the form to force the government to accept their letter to HHS in lieu of the form is different.

    Whoever wrote that letter will surely burn in hell now.

  5. This will continue until sanity is restored - and since Roberts and his fellow panty sniffers are there for life, it’s going to take a long time for sanity to return. In the meantime, I am renaming my lady parts my hobby lobby.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

71 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ullariitta_2 Avatar for slbinva Avatar for esmense Avatar for the_lone_apple Avatar for sergeant2 Avatar for Robman2 Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for sandyh Avatar for labman57 Avatar for kirkbross Avatar for Scruffer Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for taters Avatar for justamarine Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for fitley Avatar for daveislib Avatar for nomoredevil Avatar for John_Boner Avatar for hoagie Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for darrtown Avatar for Izzie Avatar for virginialady

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: