Judge: Mueller Doesn’t Have To Explain Source Of Info Used For Action In Troll Case

in Washington, DC on April 14, 2004. Robert Mueller named special prosecutor for Russia probe, Washington DC, USA - 17 May 2017 (Rex Features via AP Images)

Special counsel Robert Mueller won’t have to explain to a Russian company where he got information he used to take an unspecified “investigative action” — information that the company Concord Management had suggested was inappropriately obtained.

U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich on Friday denied the request for an explanation by Concord, which believed the action could have been based on information it had shared with a DOJ lawyer that’s not supposed to be working with Mueller’s team.

The issue was part of a series of discovery-related disputes in the case, where Concord is accused of funding Russia’s social media meddling in the 2016 election. At a hearing this week, Concord’s American lawyers were publicly dressed down by the judge for court filings they submitted in the disputes, including one that cited an obscene quote from “Animal House” to bash Mueller.

The request Friedrich denied Friday had to do with information that Concord Management provided the so-called firewall counsel, a DOJ lawyer separate from Mueller’s team appointed by the judge to help sort out discovery issues. Mueller’s team has sought to block Concord’s American legal team from sharing discovery with outside individuals, including the company’s executive, Putin ally Yevgeny Prigozhin. The oligarch was also charged by Mueller but has not submitted to the court’s jurisdiction. The firewall counsel is supposed to weigh in if the material that Concord’s lawyers are looking to share with those outside their team poses a national security risk.

Concord alleged that a week after it provided certain information to the counsel in August, Mueller’s team took an “investigative action” that appeared based on the information. The firewall counsel said he didn’t share the information, but Mueller wouldn’t tell Concord where it received the information then, prompting Concord’s request to the court.

Friedrich, in her brief order Friday issued after a closed-door hearing about the dispute, said that she denied based on the hearing, as well as on a filing Mueller’s team hand-delivered to her ex parte, meaning Concord’s lawyers didn’t get to read it. Concord also vehemently opposed Mueller being allowed to submit the filing ex parte.

65
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for bkmn bkmn says:

    I would love to see a boatload of indictments today.

  2. or even a small wheelbarrowful… that’d do just nicely too.

  3. Avatar for nemo nemo says:

    Judge to Concord attorneys: GFY, assholes.

  4. No source for you!

    I wonder what’ll happen when Prigozhin decides he’s not getting any more info out it so he just drops the “defense”. Are there any repercussions for the defense attorneys if the defense is revealed to be a sham effort?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

59 more replies

Participants

Avatar for fess Avatar for tom_c Avatar for triss Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for lastroth Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for jinnj Avatar for junebug Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for fdrhst Avatar for pareedave Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for maximus Avatar for drwho Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for waggaze Avatar for dicktater

Continue Discussion