Ellis Challenges Manafort Plea Deal, Wants To Sentence Him Promptly

TPM Illustration. Photo by Getty Images/The Washington Post
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis signaled he wants to move forward with sentencing Paul Manafort for the eight counts he was convicted of in Virginia this summer, and wants prosecutors to decide whether to retry him on the remaining deadlocked counts, despite Manafort’s plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller putting off such moves pending Manafort’s cooperation.

“This would be highly unusual,” Ellis said of the terms of the plea agreement, entered in a D.C. federal court last month. Ellis’ characteristically grouchy order set a hearing for Oct. 19 to begin wrapping up the retrial issues and sentencing mechanics in the Virginia case.

“In this District, the government’s decision to re-try a defendant is always made in a timely manner and sentencing occurs within two to no more than four months from entry of a guilty plea or receipt of a jury verdict,” Ellis said.

Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman, faced charges brought by Mueller in both D.C. and Virginia, after he declined an opportunity to consolidate the cases. The allegations mostly stemmed from consulting work that Manafort did in Ukraine well before he joined the Trump campaign,

The Virginia trial, focusing on bank fraud and tax fraud allegations, ended with a jury convicting him of eight of the 18 counts brought there, and deadlocking on the rest. Ellis, while presiding over the Virginia trial, was tough on the prosecutors and often questioned their tactics in front of the jury.

Just before the D.C. trial was set to begin, Manafort and Mueller reached a plea deal that allowed him to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy against the United States and one count of witness tampering. He had been facing many more counts concerning money laundering and failure to disclose foreign lobbying.

Read Ellis’ scheduling order below:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Prosecutors would like to present their sentencing recommendation on these convictions. But that’s certainly predicated on the volume and value of what Manafort provides them pre-sentencing. Ellis’ rush to sentence might hobble the effort to pry intel from Manafort. Mueller likely has much of what he’s seeking, but the judge’s actions aren’t helpful. Which is probably by design. :wink:

  2. When she was two, whenever I turned away from my daughter, she would drop her spoon from her high chair. Turn to wash dish. Bang! Turn to answer phone. Bang! Like clockwork.

  3. Judge Cranky misses the attention and wants his pound of flesh. Mueller will file something under seal and Ellis will likely oblige the OSC. I’d recommend that he watch Active Measures if he wants to know who he’s dealing with in Manafort. Not many judges will want to be known as going to the mat for a Russian agent.

  4. She had it easy. When I was two I had to walk uphill, in snow, both ways, to get to my high chair.

  5. SCOTUS is the only institution that could discipline Ellis, impose any consequences for his biased handling of the Manafort trial. Now that SCOTUS has a reliably solid majority of movement apparatchiks, Ellis can do whatever he wants to throw wrenches into the Mueller investigation without fear of reversal or other consequences.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

66 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for jcs Avatar for alcaray Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for cervantes Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for crackerjack Avatar for gtomkins Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for dont Avatar for ottnott Avatar for hallam Avatar for schmed Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for brian512 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for jakebarnes Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for holywah Avatar for thisisourcountry

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: