University of California Divests $25 Million From Private Prison Companies

FILE - In this April 13, 2009, file photo detainees leave the the cafeteria at the Stewart Detention Facility, a Corrections Corporation of America immigration facility in Lumpkin, Ga. CCA, the largest contractor for... FILE - In this April 13, 2009, file photo detainees leave the the cafeteria at the Stewart Detention Facility, a Corrections Corporation of America immigration facility in Lumpkin, Ga. CCA, the largest contractor for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, reached a preliminary agreement in May 2010, to soften confinement, free of charge, at nine immigrant facilities covering more than 7,100 beds. ICE officials see the deal, which includes Stewart, as a precursor to changes elsewhere. (AP Photo/Kate Brumback, File) MORE LESS

The University of California (UC) system has announced that it will no longer invest in private prison companies and divested the $25 million it held in GEO Group Inc, G4S, and the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), according to the Los Angeles Times.

GEO Group and CCA are two of the largest companies operating for-profit prisons in the United States.

The UC’s move comes after months of pressure from the Afrikan Black Coalition (ABC), a campus activist group that accused the university system of complicity in supporting the “prison industrial complex.”

ABC Political Director Yoel Haile called the university’s decision “historic and momentous” in a statement shared on the group’s website.

“Divesting $25 million is a good step towards shutting down private prisons by starving them of capital,” Haile said. “This victory belongs to the masses of our people languishing behind America’s mass incarceration system.”

The University of California is the first public education system to divest holdings in private prison companies. In June, a student activist campaign pushed Columbia University to become the first institute of higher education to divest from these corporations.

Both CCA and Geo Group have been sued for human rights abuses at their facilities, including sexual assault, physical abuse, forced labor, and the refusal to provide medical care.

Pablo Paez, Geo Group’s vice president of corporate relations, told the LA Times that criticisms of these companies “rely on politically motivated sources to advance the inaccurate notion that private prisons are somehow unaccountable.”

“Our facilities adhere to strict contractual requirements and standards set by state and federal governments,” Paez continued.

16
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. thank you, afrikan black coalition!

  2. Divestiture helped being down apartheid in South Africa, it help take down private prisons. People still have the power, they just have to not be afraid to use it.

  3. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    Call me what you will, but I think it’s a bad idea to allow profit in the incarceration business. The first priority of imprisonment should be rehabilitation and there’s no way a company accountable to shareholders will properly invest in that. The incentives for for-profit corrections companies are totally skewed. It’s s bad deal for the inmates as well as society at large.

  4. Shill: “[Citicisms] rely on politically motivated sources to advance the inaccurate notion that private prisons are somehow unaccountable.”

    The Arizona Department of Corrections found it cheaper in 2008, 2009 and 2010 to house inmates at public prisons vs. private ones.

    How did the GOP legislature respond? In 2012, they repealed the law requiring DOC to compare costs.

    I’d say that qualifies as “politically motivated”.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

10 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for milwaukeekent Avatar for leftflank Avatar for chammy Avatar for irasdad Avatar for baffie2 Avatar for michandaro Avatar for kitty Avatar for twowolves Avatar for dave_mb Avatar for pshah Avatar for tesla Avatar for s_man_48

Continue Discussion