Judge Who Used Gay Marriage As Excuse To Deny Divorce Gets Reprimanded

Carlos McKnight of Washington, waves a flag in support of gay marriage outside of the Supreme Court in Washington, Friday June 26, 2015. A major opinion on gay marriage is among the remaining to be released before th... Carlos McKnight of Washington, waves a flag in support of gay marriage outside of the Supreme Court in Washington, Friday June 26, 2015. A major opinion on gay marriage is among the remaining to be released before the term ends at the end of June. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS

A Tennessee judge who said the Supreme Court’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage prevented him from divorcing a local couple has been reprimanded by a state judicial conduct board, the ABA Journal reported.

Tennessee Board of Judicial Conduct issued a public reprimand of an order written by Hamilton County Chancellor Jeffrey Atherton last August that suggested that the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges meant the state judge no longer had the ability to grant a divorce to a local couple seeking it at the time.

“The conclusion reached by this Court is that Tennesseans have been deemed by the U.S. Supreme Court to be incompetent to define and address such keystone/central institutions such as marriage, and, thereby, at minimum, contested divorces,” Atherton wrote in the order.

In the order, Atheron also said “implantation of apparently new ‘super-federal-judicial’ form of benign and benevolent government, termed ‘krytocracy’ by some and ‘judi-idiocracy’ by others, with its iron fist and limp wrist, represents quite a challenge for a state level trial court.”

According to the Board’s letter — filed Dec. 23 — Atherton participated in its investigation into the order and “recognized that the order as written could have been misunderstood as undermining in the independence, integrity and impartiality of the Judiciary.”

Atherton ultimately granted the divorce after vacating the initial order, the ABA Journal said.

20
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The judge also noted in his order that the Supreme Court had not explicitly allowed him to breathe. At that point he started to hold his breath, turned blue, and eventually fell over sideways.

  2. They should’ve given him 30 days for smart alecky.

  3. There indeed is some “judi-idiocracy” at work here – by Jeffrey Atherton.

  4. Avatar for dnl dnl says:

    Make it dumb alecky. It’s nearer the mark.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

14 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for paulw Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for humpback Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for kunda311 Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for commanderogg Avatar for artmofo Avatar for dnl Avatar for pshah Avatar for ryokyo Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for professorpoopypants

Continue Discussion