Columbia Dean Affirms: ‘Jackie’ Not To Blame For Rolling Stone Story

Columbia Graduate School of Journalism Dean Steve Coll made it clear on Monday that “Jackie,” the alleged victim on whom Rolling Stone relied for its story on a rape at a University of Virginia fraternity, was not to blame for the magazine’s reporting failures.

“We do disagree with any suggestion that this was Jackie’s fault,” Coll said at a Monday press conference on the school’s review of Rolling Stone’s reporting, according to Politico. “As a matter of journalism this was a failure of methodology.”

Coll, along with two other members of Columbia’s faculty, on Sunday evening released a review of Rolling Stone’s reporting process for its story on a gang rape at the University of Virginia.

Coll’s comment on Monday followed Rolling Stone Publisher Jann Wenner’s interview with the New York Times, in which he said that while he doesn’t want to blame “Jackie,” “there is something here that is untruthful, and something sits at her doorstep.”

Sean Woods, the editor of the story, also blamed Rolling Stone’s shortcomings on attempts to cater to “Jackie.”

“Ultimately, we were too deferential to our rape victim,” Woods told the Times. “We honored too many of her requests in our reporting. We should have been much tougher, and in not doing that, we maybe did her a disservice.”

The Columbia report found that the Rolling Stone article was a “story of journalistic failure that was avoidable,” and blamed reporter Sarah Rubin Erdely, the magazine’s editors, and the fact-checking department for the story’s gaps.

After Rolling Stone published its story, “A Rape On Campus,” critics quickly began to poke holes in the article and Erdely’s reporting process. Rolling Stone published an editor’s note to say that they lost faith in the narrative presented by “Jackie,” and later asked Columbia to perform an external review of their process.

The Charlottesville, Va., police department also recently suspended its investigation into the alleged sexual assault after finding no evidence that the rape described by “Jackie” occurred.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: